>> most users do not want to lose data by default. But some ready to sacrifice.
I know at least one case when "pure speed without insurance" required when the ML model is studying. On Thu, Feb 6, 2020 at 1:39 PM Alexei Scherbakov < alexey.scherbak...@gmail.com> wrote: > I'm quite sure most users do not want to lose data by default. > > It's not wise to recommend such thing even with explicit warning. > > чт, 6 февр. 2020 г. в 13:30, Anton Vinogradov <a...@apache.org>: > > > The statement seems to be correct for cases when we'd like to perform > fast > > loading and computation and not afraid of data loss. > > Performance boost always means we lose some guarantee. > > Let's just update the proposal with the explicit warning that reducing > > backups to zero may lead to data loss on any node failure. > > > > On Thu, Feb 6, 2020 at 1:09 PM Alexei Scherbakov < > > alexey.scherbak...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Definitely wrong recommendation. > > > Please file a ticket for removal. > > > > > > чт, 6 февр. 2020 г. в 12:26, Zhenya Stanilovsky > > <arzamas...@mail.ru.invalid > > > >: > > > > > > > > > > > Igniters, i found that suggesting zero backup for performance > > > improvements > > > > sounds like malicious and further problems suggestion. May be it`s > time > > > to > > > > remove it ? > > > > > > > > Example: > > > > [07:59:27] Performance suggestions for grid (fix if possible) > > > > [07:59:27] To disable, set > > -DIGNITE_PERFORMANCE_SUGGESTIONS_DISABLED=true > > > > [07:59:27] ^-- Decrease number of backups (set 'backups' to 0) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > Best regards, > > > Alexei Scherbakov > > > > > > > > -- > > Best regards, > Alexei Scherbakov >
