I will vote "+1" for 3.0 On Thu, Dec 19, 2019 at 10:57 AM Anton Vinogradov <a...@apache.org> wrote:
> My Vote was for 3.0 > > On Thu, Dec 19, 2019 at 10:44 AM Valentin Kulichenko < > valentin.kuliche...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Is this suggested for 3.0 or 2.8? > > > > I tend to agree with Alexey - API compatibility should be preserved > within > > a major version. I would oppose doing such a change in 2.x. > > > > If this is planned for 3.0, then it's a definite +1 from me. > > > > -Val > > > > On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 11:34 PM Alexey Kuznetsov <akuznet...@apache.org > > > > wrote: > > > > > Hi! > > > > > > What if some users already using this module? > > > What they should do? Rewrite code? > > > I do not think it is a good idea. > > > > > > My "-1" here. > > > > > > On Thu, Dec 19, 2019 at 8:53 AM Anton Vinogradov <a...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > > > > > ignite-schedule does not look to be properly located or useful. > > > > My +1 here. > > > > > > > > On Thu, Dec 19, 2019 at 8:35 AM Ivan Pavlukhin <vololo...@gmail.com> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Ilya, > > > > > > > > > > I think it is a good initiative! Do we really need to keep > > > > > run/callLocall methods at all? > > > > > > > > > > ср, 18 дек. 2019 г. в 17:59, Ilya Kasnacheev <il...@apache.org>: > > > > > > > > > > > > Hello! > > > > > > > > > > > > Since 2.8 is branched, I want to initiate the discussion about > > > removal > > > > of > > > > > > ignite-schedule module. > > > > > > > > > > > > My plan as follows: > > > > > > > > > > > > Remove ignite-schedule module entirely. > > > > > > Move runLocal and callLocal methods from IgniteScheduler to > > > > > IgniteCompute. > > > > > > Delete IgniteScheduler interface with its remaining > scheduleLocal() > > > > > methods. > > > > > > > > > > > > Rationale: Ignite is not a tool for local scheduling, > > IgniteScheduler > > > > > does > > > > > > not provide any means of remote scheduling, and I don't think > > anybody > > > > is > > > > > > using that (especially since ignite-schedule is unpublished LGPL > > > > module). > > > > > > > > > > > > I would like to hear opinions as well as positive and negative > > votes > > > > > > towards this. If I won't see any activity, I will go forward with > > > JIRA > > > > > > issue. > > > > > > > > > > > > Previous discussion: > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-5565 > > > > > > We tried to move it to Quartz but it changed semantics in some > > ways. > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > Best regards, > > > > > Ivan Pavlukhin > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Alexey Kuznetsov > > > > > > -- Alexey Kuznetsov
