Start of December for 2.8 sounds good. В Ср, 18/09/2019 в 13:38 +0300, Alexey Zinoviev пишет: > Sounds good for me, I will be ready to release ML module till 1 December > (end of September is not appropriate for ML module due to known issues and > bugs) > If the whole Ignite could be released to this date I will be happy in > another case I suggest the minor release by the formula mentioned above. > > Let's ask another module maintainers here? > > ср, 18 сент. 2019 г. в 13:00, Maxim Muzafarov <mmu...@apache.org>: > > > Folks, > > > > Agree, we should start a discussion about releasing Apache Ignite 2.8 > > version right after 2.7.6 will be announced. > > Am I missing something? > > > > On Wed, 18 Sep 2019 at 12:33, Nikolay Izhikov <nizhi...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > > > of 2.7 release > > > > > > It's 2.8, of course. Sorry, for typo. > > > > > > > > > В Ср, 18/09/2019 в 12:36 +0300, Nikolay Izhikov пишет: > > > > Hello, Alexey > > > > > > > > > we have no chance to > > > > > release the whole master branch > > > > > > > > Why do you think so? > > > > From my point of view, we should start discussion of 2.7 release, > > > > shortly(end of September of similar) > > > > > > > > В Ср, 18/09/2019 в 12:04 +0300, Alexey Zinoviev пишет: > > > > > Dear Igniters, for the whole year I'm waiting for the next release of > > > > > Apache Ignite with number 2.8 or 3.0. As I understand we have no > > > > chance to > > > > > release the whole master branch, but we have cool changes in ML > > > > component > > > > > that were not released since 2.7 (Nomember 2018). > > > > > > > > > > I'm ready to become a release manager of the special release with > > > > the taste > > > > > of new ML by the formula: 2.7.6 plus new ML plus all known fixed > > > > issues for > > > > > 2.7.6 release. > > > > > > > > > > Reason: ML has a limited dependency on core/sql component and could > > > > be > > > > > delivered without major changes in 2.7.6 > > > > > > > > > > I hope to found the support from the community side and maybe we > > > > deliver > > > > > another components like Thin Clients, Spark integration and another > > > > ready > > > > > component without strong ties with core component in the future > > > > according > > > > > this way (in release 2.7.9 for example) > > > > > > > > > > What do you think, Igniters?
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part