Hello! I don't see why it should break backward compatibility and protocol. Can you please elaborate? I imagine that Thin client with TX muxing support will just send different requests to which server will respond differently. Why would anything break?
Regards, -- Ilya Kasnacheev пн, 26 авг. 2019 г. в 14:16, Igor Sapego <isap...@apache.org>: > Ilya, > > This will break backward compatibility and probably protocol, and this is > not something we should discuss in the context of this specific task. More > like this is a topic for 3.0 wishlist. > > Best Regards, > Igor > > > On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 12:28 PM Ilya Kasnacheev < > ilya.kasnach...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Hello! > > > > Also, let's not add IGNITE_ settings for options that can reasonably be > > configured from IgniteConfiguration. Let's keep it for very edge cases. > > > > Regards, > > -- > > Ilya Kasnacheev > > > > > > пн, 26 авг. 2019 г. в 12:27, Ilya Kasnacheev <ilya.kasnach...@gmail.com > >: > > > > > Hello! > > > > > > Do we still need to separate client connector configuration from thin > > > connector configuration from ODBC connector configuration? > > > > > > I think this is a bad practice: For example, people often turn on SSL > or > > > auth on just a subset of connectors, think they are secure, when in > fact > > > they still have unsecured connector around (e.g. ODBC) and their data > is > > > not protected at all. > > > > > > It may solve some specific issue that you are facing, but for newcomers > > to > > > project it is a drawback. I think we should seek to not add connector > > > configurations anymore. > > > > > > Regards, > > > -- > > > Ilya Kasnacheev > > > > > > > > > пт, 23 авг. 2019 г. в 20:49, Alex Plehanov <plehanov.a...@gmail.com>: > > > > > >> Pavel, > > >> > > >> ClientConnectorConfiguration is related to JDBC, ODBC and thin > clients, > > >> the > > >> new property only related to thin clients. If we put the new property > > >> directly into ClientConnectorConfiguration, someone might think that > it > > >> also affects JDBC and ODBC. > > >> > > >> пт, 23 авг. 2019 г. в 19:59, Pavel Tupitsyn <ptupit...@apache.org>: > > >> > > >> > Igor, Alex, > > >> > > > >> > Not sure I agree with this: ThinClientConfiguration inside > > >> > ClientConnectorConfiguration. > > >> > Very confusing IMO, because ClientConnectorConfiguration is already > > >> related > > >> > to thin clients only. > > >> > > > >> > Why not put the new property directly into > > ClientConnectorConfiguration? > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >
