+1 for keeping indexes as is. Moreover, sorry for off-topic Lucene is not modular (Jigsaw-compliant), and having this dependency in ignite-indexing make this jar also Java module - incompliant.
ср, 20 мар. 2019 г. в 13:15, Maxim Muzafarov <maxmu...@gmail.com>: > Hello, > > The link [1] is the issue with Persistence for text indices. > > AFAIK, the issue is very difficult with their implementation and has a > doubtful performance improvement. One of the most obvious > disadvantages of persisted Lucene indexes can be that they will > dramatically slow down the node start time. So, probably, better to > keep them in-memory only. > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-5371 > > On Wed, 20 Mar 2019 at 12:31, Ilya Kasnacheev <ilya.kasnach...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > Hello! > > > > - Lucene indexes are not persistent and there are currently no plans to > > make them persistent. > > - I could say more about that ticket have you actually linked to it. > > > > Regards, > > -- > > Ilya Kasnacheev > > > > > > ср, 20 мар. 2019 г. в 09:23, Tâm Nguyễn Mạnh <nguyenmanhtam...@gmail.com > >: > > > > > Hi Igniters, > > > > > > Since Ignite have native persistent option to store data into disk, > but not > > > text indexes. I saw this issue marked as Won't Fix. May I know the > reason > > > we are not going to store text indexes into disk for now ? > > > > > > -- > > > Thanks & Best Regards > > > > > > Tam, Nguyen Manh > > > >
