Hello! I think that it makes sense.
Regards, -- Ilya Kasnacheev вт, 22 янв. 2019 г. в 22:24, Sergey Antonov <antonovserge...@gmail.com>: > Igniters, what do you think about this topic? > > пт, 11 янв. 2019 г. в 14:17, Sergey Antonov <antonovserge...@gmail.com>: > > > Sergey, > > > > Not quite, I meant: > > - boolean argument: *--word1-word2* > > - single value argument *--word1-word2 value* > > - multiple values argument *--word1-word2 value1,value2* > > > > пт, 11 янв. 2019 г. в 14:12, Sergey Kozlov <skoz...@gridgain.com>: > > > >> Sergey, > >> > >> Thanks for raising up the question. > >> > >> Did you mean following (?): > >> - boolean argument: *--word1-word2* > >> - single value argument *--word1-word2=value* > >> - multiple values argument *--word1-word2=value1 > --word1-word2=value2* > >> > >> > >> On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 2:05 PM Sergey Antonov < > antonovserge...@gmail.com > >> > > >> wrote: > >> > >> > Hi, Igniters! > >> > > >> > I want discuss and define options naming format in our utilities. I > >> found > >> > two naming styles in CommandHandler class --excludeCaches and > >> > --skip-zeros. > >> > I think we should unify it. At this moment almost all options have > >> second > >> > naming format. I am offering rename --excludeCaches to > --exclude-caches > >> and > >> > define format for future options. How about linux like format i.e. > >> > --word1-word2? > >> > > >> > -- > >> > BR, Sergey Antonov > >> > > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Sergey Kozlov > >> GridGain Systems > >> www.gridgain.com > >> > > > > > > -- > > BR, Sergey Antonov > > > > > -- > BR, Sergey Antonov >
