Hello again
If NodeJS sources found that example AuthTlsExample.js throwing exception
during execution
Output and grid configuration in
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-10447
Can someone have a look at it?
вс, 25 нояб. 2018 г. в 19:11, Stepan Pilschikov <pilshchikov....@gmail.com>:
> My bad,
> You right
>
> вс, 25 нояб. 2018 г. в 05:37, Dmitry Melnichuk <
> dmitry.melnic...@nobitlost.com>:
>
>> Stepan,
>>
>> AFAIK Map type did always behave correctly on client side, as it does
>> now. This is a corresponding piece of my test suite:
>>
>> ```
>> def test_put_get_map(client):
>>
>> cache = client.get_or_create_cache('test_map_cache')
>>
>> cache.put(
>> 'test_map',
>> (
>> MapObject.HASH_MAP,
>> {
>> (123, IntObject): 'test_data',
>> 456: ((1, [456, 'inner_test_string', 789]),
>> CollectionObject),
>> 'test_key': 32.4,
>> }
>> ),
>> value_hint=MapObject
>> )
>> value = cache.get('test_map')
>> assert value == (MapObject.HASH_MAP, {
>> 123: 'test_data',
>> 456: (1, [456, 'inner_test_string', 789]),
>> 'test_key': 32.4,
>> })
>>
>> ```
>>
>> Or is there another, more specific problem with maps?
>>
>> Dmitry
>>
>> On 11/25/18 3:56 AM, Stepan Pilschikov wrote:
>> > Dmitry,
>> >
>> > Great, checked, now all things woks well
>> > Hope that Igor made review for this PR
>> >
>> > But what about Maps? Looks like different ticket? or it can be done in
>> same
>> > ticket scope?
>> >
>> > пт, 23 нояб. 2018 г. в 23:58, Dmitry Melnichuk <
>> > dmitry.melnic...@nobitlost.com>:
>> >
>> >> Stepan,
>> >>
>> >> Sorry, I forgot to update from upstream prior to start working on this
>> >> issue, and thus brought a regression. My bad. Just merged with the
>> >> latest master. Please, check it out again.
>> >>
>> >> Dmitry
>> >>
>> >> On 11/24/18 1:37 AM, Stepan Pilschikov wrote:
>> >>> Dmitry,
>> >>>
>> >>> Iv checked and its actually work
>> >>> But a specially in this branch i found another bug
>> >>> Please look at my last comment:
>> >>>
>> >>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-10358?focusedCommentId=16697285&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels%3Acomment-tabpanel#comment-16697285
>> >>>
>> >>> пт, 23 нояб. 2018 г. в 01:21, Dmitry Melnichuk <
>> >>> dmitry.melnic...@nobitlost.com>:
>> >>>
>> >>>> Stepan,
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Thank you for your great job in evaluating Python thin client, as
>> well
>> >>>> as other thin clients.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> There was indeed a bug in Python client regarding the handling of
>> type
>> >>>> hints in Collection type. I created a fix and did a PR under
>> >>>> IGNITE-10358 task, but the same PR is also fixes the problem in
>> >>>> IGNITE-10230 task.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> As of handling the type mapping in gists you provided, I left
>> comments
>> >>>> on both tasks.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Dmitry
>> >>>>
>> >>>> On 11/21/18 6:37 PM, Stepan Pilschikov wrote:
>> >>>>> Dmitry, Alexey
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Thank you for help, this answers help me a lot with understanding
>> how
>> >>>>> clients are work
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Not so long time ago i met problem which is have expected behavior,
>> but
>> >>>> its
>> >>>>> may broke some workflows in future for some users
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Its all about not specified data types in collections and map's
>> >>>>> All description and examples in
>> >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-10358
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Dmitry, can you have a quick look at it and maybe in future somehow
>> fix
>> >>>> it?
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> пт, 26 окт. 2018 г. в 19:05, Dmitry Melnichuk <
>> >>>>> dmitry.melnic...@nobitlost.com>:
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>> Stepan!
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> TL/DR: what you got with Python client in your gist is an intended
>> >>>>>> behavior.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> Explanation: As per docs, Object array contains of type ID (which
>> is
>> >>>>>> defaults to -1) and an array of objects.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>
>> https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/binary-client-protocol-data-format#section-object-array
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> Your gist might be fixed accordingly:
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> ```
>> >>>>>> from pyignite import Client
>> >>>>>> from pyignite.datatypes import *
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> OBJECT_ARRAY_TYPE_ID = -1
>> >>>>>> OBJECT_ARRAY_CONTENTS = [1, 2]
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> client = Client()
>> >>>>>> client.connect('127.0.0.1', 10800)
>> >>>>>> cache = client.get_or_create_cache("PY_OBJECT_ARRAY")
>> >>>>>> cache.put(
>> >>>>>> 1,
>> >>>>>> (OBJECT_ARRAY_TYPE_ID, OBJECT_ARRAY_CONTENTS),
>> >>>>>> key_hint=IntObject,
>> >>>>>> value_hint=ObjectArrayObject,
>> >>>>>> )
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> # Python output: print(cache.get(1))
>> >>>>>> # (-1, [1, 2])
>> >>>>>> ```
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> The situation is similar with Map and Collection, they have types.
>> >> Types
>> >>>>>> and type IDs are mostly useless in Python, but I left them for
>> >>>>>> interoperability reasons. If you think I should kick them out, just
>> >> let
>> >>>>>> me know.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> The usage of these 3 data types is documented and tested. You can
>> >> refer
>> >>>>>> to the table in “Data types” section:
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>
>> https://apache-ignite-binary-protocol-client.readthedocs.io/en/latest/datatypes/parsers.html
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> The tests are here:
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>
>> https://github.com/apache/ignite/blob/master/modules/platforms/python/tests/test_datatypes.py#L116-L124
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> On 10/26/18 11:57 PM, Stepan Pilschikov wrote:
>> >>>>>>> Hi, everyone
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> Create new thread to centralize cross compatibility and others
>> common
>> >>>>>>> problems between thin clients
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> Tying to use Object array to exchange different data between JS,
>> PHP
>> >>>> and
>> >>>>>>> Python thin clients
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> JS and PHP simply can't put any type of arrays
>> >>>>>>> Python can put data, but if you take it, data would be completely
>> >>>>>>> different, maybe during this put process data is changed
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> Code and output:
>> >>>>>>> PHP -
>> >>>>>>
>> https://gist.github.com/pilshchikov/e887d31d4f2f36923470fead14c7801a
>> >>>>>>> JS -
>> >>>>>>
>> https://gist.github.com/pilshchikov/ba49067fd8924ebdf4414ec63838b86d
>> >>>>>>> Python -
>> >>>>>>>
>> https://gist.github.com/pilshchikov/f4bbf76e31547e2dca7d4cc5d55bd24f
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> I'm tried different data types (string, double, float, complex
>> >> objects,
>> >>>>>>> just random objects, char, byte, Date), still
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> How, from my perspective, it should works:
>> >>>>>>> put array of any type and then get this array.
>> >>>>>>> Example: put [1,2,3] -> get [1,2,3] or put [new Date(), new
>> Date()]
>> >> ->
>> >>>>>>> get [[Date object], [Date object]] (like in java thin client)
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> Looks like bug in all clients, what you think?
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> I wanted to try Collections, but i think this type have same
>> problem
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>>
>>
