ok... thought I saw gridgain interaction in an email.... Will start a new thread with my questions on test code or comment on Jira
On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 11:39 AM Dmitriy Pavlov <dpavlov....@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Paul, > > Please be more specific, GridGain can't take part in the community, only > individual contributors can. So I don't understand which contributor was > pulling 9298. > > Any feedback is appreciated, especially constructive, cause it helps in > developing a product in the right direction. But we can't enforce someone > to do something faster or in more right manner. Why don't suggest help > instead? > > Sincerely, > Dmitriy Pavlov > > чт, 20 сент. 2018 г. в 12:29, Paul Anderson <devilje...@gmail.com>: > > > Dimitiry, Re: IGNITE-9298 ... this is my first contribution, don't know > who > > is reviewing the code, I did see that it was pulled by GridGain. > > > > Additionally I was not happy about the test code, I followed what was > there > > before but it doesn't seem right. > > > > On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 9:17 AM Dmitriy Pavlov <dpavlov....@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > As always, our constraint is a review. We as the community seems to > agree > > > that review and patch commenting is a major contribution, but very few > of > > > us doing a review, and 92 tickets are in Patch Available state. > > > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Issues+waiting+for+review > > > > > > > > > Everyone can help, so tests run can be checked (e.g. in the TC Bot); > code > > > style; change itself is clear and relates to issue. Don't forget to > share > > > positive things that you like in PR/Change, does not point to problems > > > only. > > > > > > So if a ticket is accepted and merged there is usually no reason to > move > > it > > > to the next version instead of the nearest one. > > > > > > Sincerely, > > > Dmitriy Pavlov > > > > > > чт, 20 сент. 2018 г. в 3:54, Ray <ray...@cisco.com>: > > > > > > > Hello, Igniters. > > > > > > > > Is there any specific reason why this ticket is removed from 2.7 > scope? > > > > I think this ticket is important for both usability and performance. > > > > Without this ticket, we have to create an index manually identical to > > > > primary key if we want to use SQL query. > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-8386 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Sent from: http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.com/ > > > > > > > > > >
