Hi Vladimir,

I think I understand your point. I've heard negative feedback. Which is why
I would like to speak it up, I hope other Igniters who disagree with this
assignment will be feeling free to unassign ticket. I would like that noone
was trying to adapt commercial company experience to the Comminuty.

It's a pity that I need to continiously remind some of Igniters about
principle:
"If something is not happened on mailing list it is not happened."

In you case you can decide who will do ticket on dev.list - (it is
perfectly ok if only you two of you will communicate) - or tell your fellow
to pick up ticket.

Sincerely,
Dmitriy Pavlov

ср, 1 авг. 2018 г. в 10:58, Vladimir Ozerov <voze...@gridgain.com>:

> In general there is nothing wrong with assigning a ticket to someone if you
> know that this would not cause negative reaction from assignee side. The
> thing is that community has a lot of members who knows each other in person
> and in close contact for years. So there is nothing wrong if I assign a
> ticket to my fellow. Especially if ticket is complex or critically
> important for the product. These is no "project management" in such an
> action.
>
> On the other hand, we should not overuse this practice, and set specific
> assignee only if there is a string reason for this.
>
> All in all, remember that community is alive thing built of real people.
> The more rules you set without a clear reason, the more uncomfortable it is
> to be in such a community.
>
> On Wed, Aug 1, 2018 at 10:30 AM Maxim Muzafarov <maxmu...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Vyacheslav,
> >
> > Thank you! This seems exactly what I was asking about.
> >
> >
> > On Wed, 1 Aug 2018 at 10:18 Vyacheslav Daradur <daradu...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi, Maxim,
> > >
> > > There is information about project components maintainers [1], but I'm
> > > not sure if it is actual.
> > >
> > > [1]
> > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/How+to+Contribute#HowtoContribute-ReviewProcessandMaintainers
> > > On Wed, Aug 1, 2018 at 9:33 AM Maxim Muzafarov <maxmu...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Folks,
> > > >
> > > > I don't think we need additional notification for catching attention
> of
> > > > some community
> > > > experts. Such notifications can be overused by other participants.
> > > > Developer mail list
> > > > the best place we have for any discussions.
> > > >
> > > > What I really would like to have is the list of community
> > members\experts
> > > > and their zones
> > > > of Ignite project code responsibilities. May be such list already
> > exists,
> > > > does it?
> > > >
> > > > As for me, I think we should pose right the complexity of the issue
> at
> > > the
> > > > moment
> > > > of their creation. Ask expert to provide some high level
> implementation
> > > > details and
> > > > keep it unassingned, so anyone can take it.
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, 1 Aug 2018 at 01:09 Nikolay Izhikov <nizhi...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > How about mention desired expert with some predefined message?
> > > > > So expert can setup simple email filter and know about tickets that
> > > have
> > > > > to be done.
> > > > >
> > > > > Example:
> > > > >
> > > > > "[~dpavlov] TFY" - ticket for you.
> > > > >
> > > > > В Вт, 31/07/2018 в 14:04 -0700, Dmitriy Setrakyan пишет:
> > > > > > Dmitriy,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I would agree with everything you are saying. There are some
> > tickets,
> > > > > > however, that cannot be done by just anyone and preferably have
> to
> > be
> > > > > > looked at by certain domain experts. In those cases only it would
> > be
> > > OK
> > > > > to
> > > > > > assign a ticket explicitly in my view. For all other cases we
> > should
> > > > > allow
> > > > > > the community pick up a ticket they want to work on.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > D.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 10:34 AM, Dmitriy Pavlov <
> > > dpavlov....@gmail.com>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hi Igniters,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Ignite is complex project and sometimes we know
> > > > > > > 1. who can solve the issue
> > > > > > > 2. and we would like that particular contributor would take an
> > > issue.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > In the same time "in an open source community where everything
> is
> > > > > > > distributed, asynchronous and volunteer work we should leave
> the
> > > issues
> > > > > > > open to anyone until someone volunteers to work on it."
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > It seems it is not prohibited by Apache to assign it directly,
> in
> > > the
> > > > > same
> > > > > > > time it is better for community grown to avoid it:
> > > > > > > "Assigning things to people seems the role of a project manager
> > > that
> > > > > has
> > > > > > > some sort of power over the managed team. Speaking from
> > experience
> > > I
> > > > > do not
> > > > > > > take it nicely when someone that uses the project I am a
> > volunteer
> > > at
> > > > > > > (which I might now know ) "assigns work" to me."
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Please find Apache mentors' comments on this:
> > > > > > >
> > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/c6013b99940de32aae831a0b76e8fd
> > > > > > > 53febe5040e9e0d67abb4f62a5@%3Cdev.community.apache.org%3E
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Please share you vision.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Sincerely,
> > > > > > > Dmitriy Pavlov
> > > > > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > --
> > > > Maxim Muzafarov
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Best Regards, Vyacheslav D.
> > >
> > --
> > --
> > Maxim Muzafarov
> >
>

Reply via email to