Igniters, I think I can do it. As I see we already have JCache TCK tests in TC. Can I take somewhere settings/script which we are using?
2018-05-23 2:58 GMT+03:00 Dmitriy Setrakyan <dsetrak...@apache.org>: > Igniters, > > It will be great if someone in the community would pick this up. The amount > of changes are minimal and many of them only have to do with clarifying the > documentation. However, removing JSR 107 license confusion in 1.1 would be > great for Ignite. > > D. > > On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 3:04 PM, Denis Magda <dma...@apache.org> wrote: > > > Here is a list of all changes: > > https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/jsr107/BC1qKqknzKU > > > > The primary argument for the migration is a license. JCache 1.0 is > licensed > > by Oracle that causes legal issues for some of the users. Once we upgrade > > to JCache 1.1 the won't longer be a big deal. > > > > However, once we move to 1.1 we need to be sure that we comply with the > > updated specification. > > > > -- > > Denis > > > > On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 5:20 AM, Dmitry Pavlov <dpavlov....@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > Hi Denis, > > > > > > What was improved in JCache 1.1? > > > > > > Would it be useful for product to change supported spec. version? > > > > > > Sincerely, > > > Dmitriy Pavlov > > > > > > пн, 21 мая 2018 г. в 20:12, Denis Magda <dma...@apache.org>: > > > > > > > Igniters, > > > > > > > > Eventually, JCache was relicensed to Apache 2.0 and released 1.1 > > version: > > > > https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/jsr107/BC1qKqknzKU > > > > > > > > Is there anyone interested in upgrading Ignite to the new version for > > the > > > > next release? > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-8548 > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Denis > > > > > > > > > >