Thanks for proposals, guys, I will do this. Denis, Readme.io is not very convenient for some big tables. They look OK, while they have 3-4 columns, but if we are going to add more clients (or should I say "when") it is going to be a mess. This may be a one more argument when we consider to change documentation engine.
Best Regards, Igor On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 2:37 AM, Denis Magda <dma...@gridgain.com> wrote: > Igor, thanks for putting together the page. > > As for the immediate improvements, I'm backing up Alexey's suggestions. > > This page deserves to be moved to the readme.io. We'll do that once it's > sorted out how to group the thin clients' documentation. > > -- > Denis > > On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 12:39 PM, Alexey Kosenchuk < > alexey.kosenc...@nobitlost.com> wrote: > >> Hi Igor, >> >> "Get Binary Cache" (if it is about getting a complex object in a "binary" >> form, w/o deserialization) - is supported by NodeJS: >> BinaryObject is returned for a complex object if an app has not specified >> another JavaScript Object for deserialization. >> >> Maybe worth to add type registration functionality: >> - complex object type registration (supported by NodeJS) >> - enum type registration (not supported by NodeJS) >> - type name registration (not supported by NodeJS) >> >> Also, maybe add a list of all type codes, supported for read and write. >> But not sure, as all of them are supported by all three clients. >> >> Thanks, >> -Alexey >> >> 14.05.2018 22:06, Igor Sapego пишет: >> >> Hello Igniters, >>> >>> I've created a new page in wiki, that summarizes a features >>> availability of thin clients. It should help us to plan development >>> of thin clients while also helping out users to understand a state >>> of clients. >>> >>> Check it out and tell me what you think. And if there are some >>> mistakes, don't hesitate telling me. >>> >>> [1] - >>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Thin+clients+features >>> >>> Best Regards, >>> Igor >>> >>> >
