Huge +1.

On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 4:05 PM, Alexey Goncharuk <
alexey.goncha...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Igniters,
>
> We recently experienced some issues with TTL with enabled persistence, the
> issues were related to persistence implementation details. However, when we
> were adding tests to cover more cases, we found more failures, which, I
> think, reveal some fundamental issues with expire mechanism.
>
> In short, the root cause of the issue is that we expire entries on primary
> and backup nodes independently, which means:
> 1) Partition sizes may have different values at different times which will
> trigger false-negative checks on partition map exchange which was recently
> added
> 2) More importantly, this may lead to inconsistent primary and backup node
> values when EntryProcessor is used, because an entry processor may observe
> a non-null value on one node and a null value on another node.
>
> In my opinion, the second issue is critical and we must change the expiry
> mechanics to run expiry in a distributed mode, with cache mode semantics
> for entry remove.
>
> Thoughts?
>

Reply via email to