Oops, anyway, it's not a big deal. Let's sum them up :) On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 8:10 AM, Dmitry Pavlov <dpavlov....@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Denis, > > Interesting results, thank you. > > Unfortunately Ignite Persistence came twice in used features. > > And it becomes a a little bit unclear which measurement should be > considered correct: max, min, or average. > > Sincerely, > Dmitriy Pavlov > > > чт, 22 февр. 2018 г. в 4:17, Dmitriy Setrakyan <dsetrak...@apache.org>: > > > Very useful. > > > > BTW, here is the ticket for MultiMap implementation. It has a very nice > > design proposal and looks fairly simple to implement. > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-640 > > > > Hope someone in the community can pick it up. > > > > D. > > > > On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 3:56 PM, Denis Magda <dma...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > Igniters, > > > > > > The survey is off and here is a snapshot of the results: > > > https://www.surveymonkey.com/results/SM-2T8S87DH8/ > > > > > > Noteworthy observations: > > > > > > - 87% of respondents are software architects and engineers. These > are > > > the folks who help us to drive the project! > > > > > > > > > - Most of Ignite use cases are in Banks and HighTech - this is what > > the > > > consistency and in-memory speed are valued for! > > > > > > > > > - Majority of the deployments store up to 100 GB of data in up to 20 > > > nodes clusters while 10% of deployments maintain hundreds and > > thousands > > > nodes clusters - getting ready, community! > > > > > > > > > - Ignite persistence is getting as valuable as the compute grid. > > > > > > Pay attention to the last question that contains a written individual > > > feedback. It should guide our plans. For instance, I like this > proposal: > > > > > > MultiMap support like in Guava is badly needed. Hazelcast has this and > is > > > highly used collection type, so much so this forces us to have to use > > > Hazelcast over Ignite sadly in many apps > > > > > > -- > > > Denis > > > > > >
