Denis, Petr, I checked PR and found we have *overcomplicated* logic with "fabric" and "hadoop" postfixs.
Do we really need to assembly 2 editions? "Hadoop" edition still valued? My proposal is to get rid of "hadoop" edition and replace it with instruction of how to use "fabric" edition instead. Instruction will be pretty easy -> move "hadoop" folder from "optional" to root directory :) In that case we can just remove all postfix logic from maven poms and simplify release process. On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 9:20 PM, Denis Magda <dma...@apache.org> wrote: > Petr, thanks for solving it! > > Hope that Anton V. or some other build master will double-check the > changes and merge them. > > — > Denis > > > On Dec 28, 2017, at 8:29 AM, Petr Ivanov <mr.wei...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > IGNITE-7251 is done, needs review and some additional tests. See PR > #3315 [1]. > > > > > > [1] https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/3315 < > https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/3315> > > > > > > > >> On 20 Dec 2017, at 23:15, Denis Magda <dma...@apache.org> wrote: > >> > >> Petr, thanks, such a swift turnaround! > >> > >> Have you found the one who can asses and review the changes? > >> > >> Maintainers label might be helpful. Just ping them directly: > >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/How+ > to+Contribute#HowtoContribute-ReviewProcessandMaintainers < > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/How+ > to+Contribute#HowtoContribute-ReviewProcessandMaintainers> > >> > >> > >> — > >> Denis > >> > >>> On Dec 20, 2017, at 12:24 AM, Petr Ivanov <mr.wei...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> > >>> Assigned myself — done the same work while preparing RPM package. > >>> But for fixing DEVNOTES.txt waiting for review and merge of > IGNITE-7107 [1]. > >>> > >>> > >>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-7107 > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>>> On 19 Dec 2017, at 22:55, Denis Magda <dma...@apache.org> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> All the bids were accepted and the verdict is executed: > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-7251 < > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-7251> > >>>> > >>>> Who is ready to pick this up? > >>>> > >>>> — > >>>> Denis > >>>> > >>>>> On Dec 19, 2017, at 5:35 AM, Anton Vinogradov < > avinogra...@gridgain.com> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> +1б фо шур > >>>>> > >>>>> On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 9:59 AM, Vladimir Ozerov < > voze...@gridgain.com> > >>>>> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> +1б вуаштшеудн > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 2:34 AM, Valentin Kulichenko < > >>>>>> valentin.kuliche...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> +1 > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 12:24 PM, Dmitriy Setrakyan < > >>>>>> dsetrak...@apache.org > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> +1 (completely agree) > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 10:21 AM, Denis Magda <dma...@apache.org> > >>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Igniters, > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Apache Ignite binary releases still include “fabric” word in > their > >>>>>>> names: > >>>>>>>>> https://ignite.apache.org/download.cgi#binaries < > >>>>>>>>> https://ignite.apache.org/download.cgi#binaries> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> For instance, this is a full name of the previous release - > >>>>>>>>> apache-ignite-fabric-2.3.0-bin. > >>>>>>>>> It’s a little oversight on our side because the project has not > been > >>>>>>>>> positioned as a fabric for a while. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Proposal! Remove “fabric” from the name and have the binary > releases > >>>>>>>> named > >>>>>>>>> as - apache-ignite-{version}-bin. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> If we’re in consensus then let’s make the change in 2.4. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> — > >>>>>>>>> Denis > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>> > >>> > >> > > > >
