Why not just add a new policy as Val suggested? D.
On Jan 23, 2018, 4:44 PM, at 4:44 PM, Yakov Zhdanov <yzhda...@apache.org> wrote: >Val, your computation fails once it reaches the absent partition. Agree >with the point that any new computation should not start. Guys, any >ideas >on how to achieve that? I would think of scan/sql query checking that >there >is no data loss on current topology version prior to start. Val, please >note that along with queries that require full data set there can be >some >operations that require only limited partitions (most probably only 1). >So, >no point in such strict limitations. Agree? > >--Yakov
