I do not see any use case for this. Why would you want to do this? On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 11:18 AM, Dmitriy Setrakyan <dsetrak...@apache.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 11:33 PM, Vladimir Ozerov <voze...@gridgain.com> > wrote: > > > Hi Denis, > > > > "FOR UPDATE" is not supported at the moment. We will add it's support for > > transactional case [1]. In non-transactional case it would behave in the > > same way as normal SELECT. > > > > Why only for transactional cases? Why can't we lock for non-transactional > cases as well? >
