I do not see any use case for this. Why would you want to do this?

On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 11:18 AM, Dmitriy Setrakyan <dsetrak...@apache.org>
wrote:

> On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 11:33 PM, Vladimir Ozerov <voze...@gridgain.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Denis,
> >
> > "FOR UPDATE" is not supported at the moment. We will add it's support for
> > transactional case [1]. In non-transactional case it would behave in the
> > same way as normal SELECT.
> >
>
> Why only for transactional cases? Why can't we lock for non-transactional
> cases as well?
>

Reply via email to