Dima, What is the problem you are trying to solve? I am not sure I understand. You cannot force maintainers to do a review. And you cannot force release manager to do this either. Because this role is only about following mandatory ASF steps to make release happen, nothing more.
ср, 8 нояб. 2017 г. в 3:28, Dmitriy Setrakyan <dsetrak...@apache.org>: > On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 8:08 AM, Denis Magda <dma...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > However, if the release version was assigned properly, the > > > release manager or component owners would have no choice but to do the > > > review. > > > > There is actually an alternative the release managers tend to follow. > They > > simply move all the unresolved tickets to the next version blindly. This > > happens around a release day and I get a dozen of JIRA notifications > saying > > that a ticket assigned to version X was rescheduled to version Y. > > > > I do not believe this happens "blindly". These tickets get looked at before > they get reassigned. Some of them get closed as duplicates, others are > closed because they are not an issue anymore, others get reassigned to the > next release. It is still better than what we have right now. > > However, even if you are right, and the tickets are not looked at, we are > exactly at the same place we are today, when tickets just get ignored > altogether, so no harm done. > > > > > > Anyway, we cannot force a single contributor such as the release manager > > to be responsible for this. This should be a collaborative process > > established between Ignite committers. > > > > I keep hearing the word "process", but so far I have not seen anything > workable proposed. > > > > > However, regardless of the chosen process those who are going to asses > new > > tickets have to look them up first. And here is a rule of “setting a > ticket > > to the latest version” might be one of the best options. > > > > Exactly, it is the best of the worst options, and there is no better > alternative so far. My suggestion would be to start assigning the next > release version to all the tickets until the community comes up with a > better process. > > D. >