Looks good to me. Clean layout, fast build - do we need anything else? On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 12:06 PM, Oleg Ostanin <oosta...@gridgain.com> wrote:
> Great news, thanks a lot! > > On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 11:47 AM, Pavel Tupitsyn <ptupit...@apache.org> > wrote: > >> DocFX takes around 30 seconds on my machine. >> >> > if you already tried that >> Yes, everything is done on my side, see JIRA ticket [4] and preview [5] >> above. >> >> On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 11:45 AM, Ilya Suntsov <isunt...@gridgain.com> >> wrote: >> >> > Pavel, thanks! >> > It is the great news! >> > Looks like DocFX will save 30-40 min. >> > >> > 2017-09-05 11:16 GMT+03:00 Pavel Tupitsyn <ptupit...@apache.org>: >> > >> > > Igniters and users, >> > > >> > > Historically we've been using Doxygen [1] to generate .NET API >> > > documentation [2]. >> > > >> > > Recently it became very slow on our code base (more than 30 minutes to >> > > generate), and I could not find any solution or tweak to fix that. >> Other >> > > issues include outdated looks and limited customization possibilities. >> > > >> > > I propose to replace it with DocFX [3] [4]: >> > > - Popular .NET Foundation project >> > > - Good looks and usability out of the box >> > > - Easy to set up >> > > >> > > Our docs will look like this: [5] >> > > Let me know if you have any objections or suggestions. >> > > >> > > Pavel >> > > >> > > >> > > [1] http://www.stack.nl/~dimitri/doxygen/ >> > > [2] https://ignite.apache.org/releases/latest/dotnetdoc/index.html >> > > [3] https://dotnet.github.io/docfx/ >> > > [4] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-6253 >> > > [5] https://ptupitsyn.github.io/docfx-test/api/index.html >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Ilya Suntsov >> > >> > >
