Your suggestions sounds reasonable to me. Are they only about the calculations 
at the code level or you propose to change the message format too?

—
Denis

> On Aug 30, 2017, at 3:24 AM, Vladimir Ozerov <voze...@gridgain.com> wrote:
> 
> I looked at the code of IGNITE-6182 (memory policy suggestions), and I do
> not like it. Too complex. My proposal:
> 1) Do not take in count JVM heap. First, we do not need whether it will be
> really used or not. Second, we never checked it in heap-based Ignite 1.x,
> and never had a single compliant.
> 2) We need to sum up all memory policies and *checkpoint buffer size*. If
> it exceeds 80% of machine's RAM - print a warning
> 
> On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 7:26 PM, Denis Magda <dma...@apache.org> wrote:
> 
>> Anton, thanks for stepping in! The tickets set looks complete for me!
>> 
>> Let’s start the vote once the fixes are merged and tests pass.
>> 
>> —
>> Denis
>> 
>>> On Aug 28, 2017, at 7:19 AM, Anton Vinogradov <avinogra...@gridgain.com>
>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Igniters,
>>> 
>>> Seems 2.2 is a urgent bugfix release, so it should be based on 2.1,
>>> In this case all other issues with fixVersion = 2.2 should be moved to
>> 2.3.
>>> 
>>> Currently, I see 835 issues with fixVersion = 2.2
>>> 
>>> Seems we should have only 4 issues with fixVersion = 2.2:
>>> - Change default max memory size from 80% to 20% -
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-6182
>>> - Detecting low memory on ignite node startup -
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-6003
>>> - Backport of improvements to checkpoint algorithm -
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-????
>>> - ML profile is missing in 2.1 binary release -
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-6193
>>> 
>>> Please correct me in case I've missed something.
>>> 
>>> Ivan,
>>>> Let's include to the release tickets with optimizations of checkpointing
>>> algorithm:
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-6178
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-6033
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-5961
>>>> This will help users who are experiencing problems with slow
>> checkpoints.
>>>> Also, let's include https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-6183
>> to
>>> soften "Ignite node crashed in the middle of checkpoint" message as per
>>> discussion <
>>> http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.
>> com/Ignite-close-G-stop-name-true-Change-flag-cancel-to-false-td20473.html
>>>> .
>>> 
>>> All of these issues should have fixVersion 2.3.
>>> Please create backport issue and link it to all necessary issues.
>>> 
>>> P.s. I've created branch ignite-2.2, currently it equals to ignite-2.1.
>>> 
>>> On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 4:05 PM, Anton Vinogradov <
>> avinogra...@gridgain.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Denis,
>>>> 
>>>>> BTW, who is considered to be the release manager of this release?
>>>> I'll do it.
>>>> 
>>>> On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 3:54 PM, Seliverstov Igor <gvvinbl...@gmail.com
>>> 
>>>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Ok, the check happens at the node start time or on NODE_JOIN event
>>>>> 
>>>>> in general it looks like:
>>>>> 
>>>>> 1) calculate expected used memory = heap max + system cache max + all
>>>>> custom policies max + default policy size and put it into a node
>> attribute
>>>>> 
>>>>> 2) get total physycal memory, calculate expected safe to be used memory
>>>>> amount (leave 4 gb min or 20% of available memory for OS)
>>>>> 
>>>>> 3) if expected used memory + expected used memory of other nodes on the
>>>>> host > than safe to be used memory amount, start calculating
>> suggestions
>>>>> 
>>>>> 4) Each ignite instance needs at least 512mb heap + 40mb system cache +
>>>>> 100mb default polycy, if available memory is less we cannot suggest
>>>>> anything reasonable, print warning, stop calculation.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 5) check heap size (shouldn't exceed 30% of available memory
>> (total_memory
>>>>> - reserved for OS memory) * 30% for all JVMs, if it exeedes, suggest
>> just
>>>>> calculated value or 512MB minimal)
>>>>> 
>>>>> 6) check if system cache size changed, suggest default value if it's so
>>>>> 
>>>>> 7) in case 100 mb * policies count < available memory, suggest using
>>>>> default policy with max size equals to remaining memory (available -
>> heap
>>>>> -
>>>>> system cache)
>>>>> 
>>>>> 8) calculate new size for each memory policy ( it's user defined size *
>>>>> (remaining / (all_policies_size * nodes_cnt)); in proportion to
>>>>> remaining memory, devided by nodes number on the host or 100 mb
>> minimal)
>>>>> 
>>>>> 9) print suggestions
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 2017-08-28 15:10 GMT+03:00 Dmitriy Setrakyan <dsetrak...@apache.org>:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> Igor, can you please describe the algorithm with all the thresholds?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 4:56 AM, Seliverstov Igor <
>> gvvinbl...@gmail.com
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> The suggestion here is based on initial settings, and it's so because
>>>>>> there
>>>>>>> is no other nodes on the host in the example.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> The algorithm tries to preserve the original ratio of memory policies
>>>>>>> keeping numbers reasonable (for example after some thresshold it will
>>>>>>> suggest not to use several memory policies if there is not enough of
>>>>>> memory
>>>>>>> for all of them) and taking into consideration nodes count on the
>>>>> host,
>>>>>>> each jvm heap, needed memory for OS, etc
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 2017-08-28 14:38 GMT+03:00 Dmitriy Setrakyan <dsetrak...@apache.org
>>> :
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Looks good, but why in the example provided are we suggesting 8GB? 2
>>>>>>> nodes
>>>>>>>> with 8GB will completely exhaust the available memory. I would
>>>>> suggest
>>>>>> 6
>>>>>>> or
>>>>>>>> 7GB.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Also, why 100MB for default policy. Anything under 1GB seems too
>>>>> small.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Can you please comment?
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> D.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 3:31 AM, Seliverstov Igor <
>>>>>> gvvinbl...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> One more example of possible warning:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> -----------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>> Excessive memory usage by Ignite node process (performance may
>>>>> drop)
>>>>>>>>> [requested=44613MB, available=15942MB].
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Please tune the folowing settings as suggested:
>>>>>>>>> MemoryPolicyConfiguration.initialSize for bigPlc: 8102MB
>>>>>>>>> MemoryPolicyConfiguration.maxSize     for bigPlc: 8102MB
>>>>>>>>> MemoryPolicyConfiguration.initialSize for dfltPlc: 100MB
>>>>>>>>> MemoryPolicyConfiguration.maxSize     for dfltPlc: 100MB
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Current settings:
>>>>>>>>> Java Heap  maxSize: 3543MB
>>>>>>>>> Java Heap initSize: 250MB
>>>>>>>>> MemoryPolicyConfiguration.initialSize for bigPlc: 256MB
>>>>>>>>> MemoryPolicyConfiguration.maxSize     for bigPlc: 40960MB
>>>>>>>>> MemoryPolicyConfiguration.initialSize for dfltPlc: 10MB
>>>>>>>>> MemoryPolicyConfiguration.maxSize     for dfltPlc: 10MB
>>>>>>>>> The overall expected memory usage by all Ignite nodes on the
>>>>> host:
>>>>>>>>> 44613MB
>>>>>>>>> -----------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Your thoughts?
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 2017-08-28 5:06 GMT+03:00 Denis Magda <dma...@apache.org>:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Guys,
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> ML lib profile is missing in 2.1 release! That must be fixed and
>>>>>>> rolled
>>>>>>>>>> out in this emergency release:
>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-6193 <
>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-6193>
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Oleg, Yuri, please step in and handle the issue.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> BTW, who is considered to be the release manager of this
>>>>> release?
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> —
>>>>>>>>>> Denis
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> On Aug 25, 2017, at 2:29 PM, Dmitriy Setrakyan <
>>>>>>>> dsetrak...@apache.org>
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> I like the format proposed by Denis, very clear.
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> However, I also do not understand why a user should change the
>>>>>> size
>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>> some
>>>>>>>>>>> system cache. How would a user ever know what value to put
>>>>> there?
>>>>>>>> This
>>>>>>>>>>> value should be configured by Ignite automatically.
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> D.
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 2:24 PM, Denis Magda <
>>>>> dma...@apache.org>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Igor,
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Let me suggest this format.
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>>> Excessive memory usage by Ignite node process (performance
>>>>> may
>>>>>>> drop)
>>>>>>>>>>>> [requested=29251MB, available=15942MB]
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Please tune the following settings:
>>>>>>>>>>>> [MemoryConfiguration.defaultMemoryPolicySize = suggested
>>>>>> value]
>>>>>>>>>>>> MemoryConfiguration.systemCacheMaxSize = suggested value
>>>>>>>>>>>> [MemoryPolicyConfiguration.maxSize for {policy_name_1} =
>>>>>>> suggested
>>>>>>>>>>>> value]
>>>>>>>>>>>> [MemoryPolicyConfiguration.maxSize for {policy_name_2} =
>>>>>>> suggested
>>>>>>>>>>>> value]
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Current settings:
>>>>>>>>>>>> [DefaultMemoryPolicySize = value]
>>>>>>>>>>>> [{policy_name_1} size = value]
>>>>>>>>>>>> [{policy_name_1} size = value]
>>>>>>>>>>>> SystemCacheInitialSize = value
>>>>>>>>>>>> SystemCacheMaxSize = value
>>>>>>>>>>>> Java Heap Init Size = value
>>>>>>>>>>>> Java Heap Max Size = value
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> The overall memory usage by all Ignite nodes on the host:
>>>>> value
>>>>>>>>>>>> -------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Records in […] are optional. If custom memory policy is not
>>>>> set
>>>>>> or
>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>> default memory policy is overridden the output will miss
>>>>> some of
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>> rows.
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> As for systemCacheMaxSize, it should be show ONLY if the
>>>>>> parameter
>>>>>>>> was
>>>>>>>>>> set
>>>>>>>>>>>> explicitly by user code. Otherwise, the platform should be
>>>>> wise
>>>>>>>> enough
>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>> instantiate it properly depending on the host memory usage.
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> —
>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Aug 25, 2017, at 1:49 PM, Seliverstov Igor <
>>>>>>>> gvvinbl...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> The message without logging layout:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Not enough memory for current process [required=29251MB,
>>>>>>>>>>>> available=15942MB].
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please change MemoryConfiguration.systemCacheMaxSize and
>>>>>>>>>>>>> MemoryConfiguration.defaultMemoryPolicySize to decrease
>>>>> memory
>>>>>>>>>> allocated
>>>>>>>>>>>>> for each node.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Current settings:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> HeapInit=250MB
>>>>>>>>>>>>> HeapMax=3543MB
>>>>>>>>>>>>> DefaultMemoryPolicySize=12753MB
>>>>>>>>>>>>> SystemCacheInitialSize=40MB
>>>>>>>>>>>>> SystemCacheMaxSize=100MB
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Other ignite instanses on the server require: 12853MB
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think it's make sense to describe what these numbers are
>>>>>>> consist
>>>>>>>>> of.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> We simple say which parameters have an impact on how much
>>>>>> memory
>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> instance needs and their (parameters) actual values.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Also we notice that more than one Ignite instance are ran on
>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>> server
>>>>>>>>>>>> or
>>>>>>>>>>>>> workstation and it also consumes memory.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 25 авг. 2017 г. 21:30 пользователь "Dmitriy Setrakyan" <
>>>>>>>>>>>>> dsetrak...@apache.org> написал:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Igor, what is this flood of WARN messaging coming after the
>>>>>>> text?
>>>>>>>>> Are
>>>>>>>>>> we
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> really going to print this whole thing out?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 9:49 AM, Seliverstov Igor <
>>>>>>>>>> gvvinbl...@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This message appears on topology change in case the
>>>>> available
>>>>>>>>> memory
>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> exceeded
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-08-25 19:47 GMT+03:00 Seliverstov Igor <
>>>>>>>> gvvinbl...@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> An example of current impl:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2017-08-25 19:44:37,740][WARN ][disco-event-worker-#29%
>>>>>>>> internal.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GridHomePathSelfTest0%][GridDiscoveryManager]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2017-08-25 19:44:37,740][WARN ][disco-event-worker-#29%
>>>>>>>> internal.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GridHomePathSelfTest0%][GridDiscoveryManager] Not enough
>>>>>>> memory
>>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> current process [required=29251MB, available=15942MB].
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2017-08-25 19:44:37,740][WARN ][disco-event-worker-#29%
>>>>>>>> internal.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GridHomePathSelfTest0%][GridDiscoveryManager] Please
>>>>> change
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> MemoryConfiguration.systemCacheMaxSize and
>>>>>>> MemoryConfiguration.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> defaultMemoryPolicySize
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to decrease memory allocated for each node.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2017-08-25 19:44:37,740][WARN ][disco-event-worker-#29%
>>>>>>>> internal.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GridHomePathSelfTest0%][GridDiscoveryManager]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2017-08-25 19:44:37,740][WARN ][disco-event-worker-#29%
>>>>>>>> internal.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GridHomePathSelfTest0%][GridDiscoveryManager] Current
>>>>>>> settings:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2017-08-25 19:44:37,740][WARN ][disco-event-worker-#29%
>>>>>>>> internal.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GridHomePathSelfTest0%][GridDiscoveryManager]
>>>>>>> HeapInit=250MB
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2017-08-25 19:44:37,741][WARN ][disco-event-worker-#29%
>>>>>>>> internal.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GridHomePathSelfTest0%][GridDiscoveryManager]
>>>>>>> HeapMax=3543MB
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2017-08-25 19:44:37,741][WARN ][disco-event-worker-#29%
>>>>>>>> internal.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GridHomePathSelfTest0%][GridDiscoveryManager]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> DefaultMemoryPolicySize=
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 12753MB
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2017-08-25 19:44:37,741][WARN ][disco-event-worker-#29%
>>>>>>>> internal.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GridHomePathSelfTest0%][GridDiscoveryManager]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> SystemCacheInitialSize=40MB
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2017-08-25 19:44:37,741][WARN ][disco-event-worker-#29%
>>>>>>>> internal.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GridHomePathSelfTest0%][GridDiscoveryManager]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> SystemCacheMaxSize=100MB
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2017-08-25 19:44:37,741][WARN ][disco-event-worker-#29%
>>>>>>>> internal.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GridHomePathSelfTest0%][GridDiscoveryManager]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2017-08-25 19:44:37,741][WARN ][disco-event-worker-#29%
>>>>>>>> internal.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GridHomePathSelfTest0%][GridDiscoveryManager] Other
>>>>> ignite
>>>>>>>>>> instanses
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the server require: 12853MB
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2017-08-25 19:44:37,741][WARN ][disco-event-worker-#29%
>>>>>>>> internal.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GridHomePathSelfTest0%][GridDiscoveryManager]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-08-25 17:40 GMT+03:00 Sergey Kozlov <
>>>>>>> skoz...@gridgain.com
>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I suppose we should not forget JVM heap size and
>>>>> suggest to
>>>>>>>>> reduce
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> both
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> options
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 5:24 PM, Dmitriy Setrakyan <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dsetrak...@apache.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Igor, I would change the message. How about this:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Required RAM size is larger than total physical memory
>>>>>>>> available
>>>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> OS.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please change MemoryConfiguration.WhichProperty and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> MemoryPolicyConfiguration.WhichProperty to decrease
>>>>>> memory
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> allocated
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> each node.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Also, can we calculate what the memory size allocated
>>>>> for
>>>>>>> each
>>>>>>>>>> node
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be? In that case we should suggest it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> D.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 7:20 AM, Seliverstov Igor <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> gvvinbl...@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What do you, guys think about next warning?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2017-08-25 17:17:04,718][INFO
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ][test-runner-#1%internal.GridHomePathSelfTest%][
>>>>>>> GridHomePat
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hSelfTest0]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> System cache's MemoryPolicy size is configured to 40
>>>>> MB.
>>>>>>> Use
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> MemoryConfiguration.systemCacheMemorySize property to
>>>>>>> change
>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> setting.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2017-08-25 17:17:04,718][WARN
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ][test-runner-#1%internal.GridHomePathSelfTest%][
>>>>>>> GridHomePat
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hSelfTest0]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Required RAM size is larger than total physical
>>>>> memory
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> available
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> OS.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Check your configuration to avoid swap partition
>>>>>> usage.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Use MemoryConfiguration and
>>>>> MemoryPolicyConfiguration
>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> change
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> settings.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Physical memory [required=16397MB,
>>>>> available=15942MB]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2017-08-25 17:17:04,726][WARN
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ][test-runner-#1%internal.GridHomePathSelfTest%][
>>>>>>> GridHomePat
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hSelfTest0]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Peer class loading is enabled (disable it in
>>>>> production
>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> performance
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> deployment consistency reasons)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2017-08-25 17:17:04,726][INFO
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ][test-runner-#1%internal.GridHomePathSelfTest%][
>>>>>>> GridHomePat
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hSelfTest0]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Configured caches [in 'sysMemPlc' memoryPolicy:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ['ignite-sys-cache']]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2017-08-25 17:17:04,731][INFO
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ][test-runner-#1%internal.GridHomePathSelfTest%][
>>>>>>> GridHomePat
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hSelfTest0]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3-rd party licenses can be found at:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> /home/gvvinblade/projects/igni
>>>>> te/incubator-ignite/libs/
>>>>>>>>> licenses
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-08-25 13:26 GMT+03:00 Yakov Zhdanov <
>>>>>>>> yzhda...@apache.org
>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Agree, let's release new version including tickets
>>>>>>> mentioned
>>>>>>>>> by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ivan.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --Yakov
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sergey Kozlov
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GridGain Systems
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> www.gridgain.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>> 
>> 

Reply via email to