Guys, lets suggest the format for this log. Yakov's version is "print only nodes that differ on +/-10% from average partitions count we can print problem message looks like:
[cacheName=NAME, nodes=[nodeId=<ID, totalPartitionsCount=<count>, percentageOfTotalPartsCount=<percentage>, parts=[<count>, ...,<count>]] Where the first element of parts array is a count of primary partitions, the second is count of backup0 partitions etc. The default value of the property IGNITE_PART_DISTRIBUTION_WARN_THRESHOLD must disable distribution calculation because it takes <caches_count> * <parttitons_count> * <nodes_count> operations per node. " Do you agree ? ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Вадим Опольский <vaopols...@gmail.com> Date: 2017-06-04 13:42 GMT+03:00 Subject: Fwd: place for printing info about partition distribution (IGNITE-4756) To: Denis Magda <dma...@apache.org>, tled...@gridgain.com, Yakov Zhdanov < yzhda...@gridgain.com> Hello guys! I cant start resolve issue 4756 (https://issues.apache.org/ jira/browse/IGNITE-4756) because don't understand place for pinting info about partition. Yakov, Taras do you have any idea about it ? Vadim Opolski ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Вадим Опольский <vaopols...@gmail.com> Date: 2017-05-31 18:24 GMT+03:00 Subject: place for printing info about partition distribution To: dev@ignite.apache.org, Denis Magda <dma...@apache.org>, tled...@gridgain.com, Yakov Zhdanov <yzhda...@gridgain.com> Hello guys! I want to discuss and suggest some format and place for pinting info about partition distribution to log from issue https://issues.apache.org/jira /browse/IGNITE-4756 What do you think about it ? Issue is about RendezvousAffinityFunction and FairAffinityFunction classes. Vadim
