I even think that we should remove Marshaller interface at all in future major release and use only binary. Too many things just work without BinaryMarshaller. We cannot afford non-binary Marshallers any more.
пт, 26 мая 2017 г. в 21:49, Dmitriy Setrakyan <[email protected]>: > On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 8:29 AM, Igor Rudyak <[email protected]> wrote: > > > If binary objects is the only option starting from Ignite 2.0 than it > makes > > sense. > > > > If we still support regular java objects, than it looks a bit confusing > to > > disallowing such annotations. Especially if they don't break anything. > > > > We still support regular objects, but we cannot allow annotations that only > work half of the time. I think it is best to only use field annotation and > have them work 100% of the time. > > > > > > > > On May 26, 2017 12:55 AM, "Vladimir Ozerov" <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > Igor, > > > > One more reason why we disallowed both annotations on methods is that > > binary objects doesn't have "method" concept, it only has fields. As > binary > > mode is the default one it doesn't make sense to allow these annotations > on > > methods any more. > > > > On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 8:57 AM, Dmitriy Setrakyan < > [email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > Igor, > > > > > > As far as I know, we are not going to have a requirement for user > classes > > > on the server side. Since the server is not aware about the classes, > then > > > method annotations do not make sense anymore. > > > > > > According to the tickets, the change has been introduced in 2.0, so it > > was > > > OK to break backward compatibility where necessary. > > > > > > D. > > > > > > On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 10:32 PM, Igor Rudyak <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > > Hi guys, > > > > > > > > Does anybody know what's the reason for disabling *@QuerySqlField* > and > > > > *@AffinityKeyMapped* annotations on methods in *Ignite 2.1* ? > > > > > > > > Just found two JIRA tickets for this, but there are no details there: > > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-5036 > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4950 > > > > > > > > The problem is that this implementation brakes backward compatibility > > for > > > > previous deployments utilizing Ignite-Cassandra module and POJO > classes > > > > using such annotations. > > > > > > > > Igor > > > > > > > > > >
