Guys, IGNITE-3562 [1] is ready for review. Upsource review link is attached to the ticket. Would someone please handle it?
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3562 On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 8:21 PM, Andrey Mashenkov < andrey.mashen...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Sergey, > > Yes, lucene 5.5.4 jars are present in maven repository, but no > Apache-ServiceMix bundle for 5.5.4. > It is used by ignite-osgi-karaf module. See feature configuration with > name="ignite-indexing" in modules/osgi-karaf/src/ > main/resources/feature.xml > > > On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 6:59 PM, Sergey Kozlov <skoz...@gridgain.com> > wrote: > >> Hi Andrey >> >> I see 5.5.4 in maven repository >> https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.apache.lucene/lucene-core/5.5.4 >> >> On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 6:48 PM, Andrey Mashenkov < >> andrey.mashen...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > Thanks. This fact was missed in migration guide. >> > >> > We have dependency to lucene in our osgi module, that refer to Apache >> > ServiceMix :: Bundles [1] . >> > I can't see bundle for Lucene-5.5.4 in list, but there is a bundle for >> > Lucene-5.5.2. >> > >> > Let's upgrade to Lucene-5.5.2. >> > >> > [1] >> > https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.apache. >> > servicemix.bundles/org.apache.servicemix.bundles.lucene >> > >> > >> > On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 6:07 PM, 李玉珏@163 <18624049...@163.com> wrote: >> > >> > > Lucene6 requires JDK8 and later versions, and I think it might be >> > > reasonable to update to the Lucene5.5.4 version. >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > 在 2017/5/23 22:07, Andrey Mashenkov 写道: >> > > >> > >> Hi Igniters, >> > >> >> > >> Ignite-indexing module has outdated dependency to >> apache-lucene-3.5.0, >> > >> however, actual version of lucene for now is 6.5.1. Here is a ticket >> > [1]. >> > >> >> > >> Store format version of 3.x is deprecated in 4.x and does not >> supported >> > at >> > >> all >> > >> in higher versions, that cause difficulties to integrate with ignite >> on >> > >> user side. >> > >> >> > >> Apache Lucene 6.x seems doen't support <=4.x index format, >> > >> but 5.x index format can be used via additional jar with old codecs. >> > >> >> > >> Also, I've found GridLuceneIndex stores index in offheap via old >> > approach >> > >> and >> > >> page memory is not supported, so it can't be persisted (looking >> forward >> > to >> > >> PDS). >> > >> >> > >> Seems, we will not break any compatibility if we upgrade lucene >> version >> > in >> > >> 2.1, >> > >> until (or together with) Ignite full-text-search component supports >> page >> > >> memory and PDS merged to ignite. >> > >> I think we should upgrade to latest 6.x version, as it will much >> harder >> > to >> > >> do it later. >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> Is there any cons\pros to upgrade lucene dependency up to latest 6.x >> > >> version? >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3562 >> > >> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Best regards, >> > Andrey V. Mashenkov >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> Sergey Kozlov >> GridGain Systems >> www.gridgain.com >> > > > > -- > Best regards, > Andrey V. Mashenkov > -- Best regards, Andrey V. Mashenkov
