Pavel,

Yes, these two:
http://ci.ignite.apache.org/admin/editBuildParams.html?id=buildType:Ignite20Tests_IgniteBasic
http://ci.ignite.apache.org/admin/editBuildParams.html?id=buildType:Ignite20Tests_IgniteBinaryBasic

They both execute org.apache.ignite.testsuites.IgniteBasicTestSuite. Looks
like we should merge them accurately.

On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 10:27 AM, Dmitry Pavlov <dpavlov....@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi, Vladimir,
>
> There is a chance that in
> http://ci.ignite.apache.org/project.html?projectId=Ignite20Tests&tab=
> projectOverview
> some
> configs are for binary + simple oblect names (no package name) tests.
>
> But if there is some suspicious link that is candidate to removal, please
> feel free to contact me.
>
> Best Regards,
> Dmitry Pavlov
>
> вт, 23 мая 2017 г. в 10:24, Vladimir Ozerov <voze...@gridgain.com>:
>
> > Fantastic news, thank you guys! Though, I still see "Basic" and "Binary
> > Object Basic" suites. Should we drop one of them as well?
> >
> > On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 10:20 AM, Alexey Goncharuk <
> > alexey.goncha...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Igniters,
> > >
> > > Since we removed OptimizedMarshaller in Ignite 2.0 from the PublicAPI,
> we
> > > had a chance to remove several unnecessary test suites from the build
> > plan
> > > from Ignite 2.0. I pushed the changes for IGNITE-4947 ticket. From this
> > > moment you should run tests from Ignite 2.0 project, which is 14 test
> > > suites shorter than the previous plan.
> > >
> > > Kudos to Alexander Paschenko and Dmitriy Pavlov!
> > >
> > > --AG
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to