Looks a little tight. Let's hope we can make it. On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 1:29 PM, Denis Magda <dma...@apache.org> wrote:
> Well, let me propose the following milestones for 2.1 release then. > > Code freeze: June 2nd. > Final QA and benchmarking: June 5 - June 8 > Voting: ~ June 9 > Release: ~ June 13 > > Also I heard H2 has to be released once again to support Ignite’s CREATE > table command. Think that we should talk to H2 folks to make it happen in > June 22nd - June 2nd time frame. > > — > Denis > > > On May 11, 2017, at 2:26 AM, Pavel Tupitsyn <ptupit...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > > As for .NET, I would propose to concentrate on peer deployment > (IGNITE-2492) > > and related stuff, like IGNITE-1894 .NET: Delegate support in the API via > > extension methods. > > > > SQL Dependency does not look important to me, we can reschedule it for > > later versions. > > > > On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 12:01 PM, Dmitriy Setrakyan < > dsetrak...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > > >> Vyacheslav, I think it is worth the research, but you should always keep > >> data querying and indexing in mind. For example, I don't see how by-page > >> compression will solve it. > >> > >> On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 1:52 AM, Vyacheslav Daradur < > daradu...@gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >> > >>> Dmitriy, > >>> > >>> I'm researching a best way for this future. > >>> > >>> At the moment I found only one way (querying and indexing compatible), > >> this > >>> is per-objects-field compression. > >>> > >>> But there is a good proffit only for long strings or fields with large > >>> objects. > >>> > >>> Maybe it makes sense just to introduce compression for string fileds. > >>> > >>> I'm researching the new page-memory architecture as applied to by-page > >>> compression. > >>> > >>> 2017-05-11 11:30 GMT+03:00 Dmitriy Setrakyan <dsetrak...@apache.org>: > >>> > >>>> On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 12:44 AM, Vyacheslav Daradur < > >>> daradu...@gmail.com> > >>>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> Denis, > >>>>> > >>>>> The described roadmap looks great! > >>>>> > >>>>> Additional, I vote for introducing an ability (OOTB) to store objects > >>> in > >>>> a > >>>>> cache in a compressed form. > >>>>> This will allow to store more data at the cost of incriasing of CPU > >>>>> utilization. > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> One of the problems with compression is indexing and querying. How do > >> we > >>>> index the data if it is compressed? > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> 2017-05-11 4:23 GMT+03:00 Denis Magda <dma...@apache.org>: > >>>>> > >>>>>> Igniters, > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Let me start a discussion around the scope for 2.1 release. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> In my vision the main direction of our ongoing efforts should be > >>>>>> implementing in life a use case of Ignite as a transactional > >>>> distributed > >>>>>> SQL database and HTAP platform. The current use cases (database > >>> cache, > >>>>> data > >>>>>> grid, micro services platform, etc.) will be supported as usual, no > >>>>> changes > >>>>>> on that frontier. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Keeping this in mind, the roadmap needs to include essential SQL > >>>> related > >>>>>> features as well as disk based capabilities, MVCC support, advanced > >>> DDL > >>>>>> implementation and so on so forth. This is for Ignite as a SQL > >>>> database. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Next, Machine Learning will be a great addition to Ignite as an > >> HTAP > >>>>>> platform offering. This is why we should keep investing our time > >> and > >>>>>> resources in that recently released component. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Having this said, I see the scope for 2.1 release this way: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> 1. Distributed Persistent Store - if the donation is accepted by > >> ASF. > >>>> The > >>>>>> decision is to be done in separate discussion. W/o the store > >>>>>> Ignite can only be used as In-Memory SQL database. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> 2. SQL Grid: > >>>>>> - CREATE & DROP table commands: https://issues.apache.org/ > >>>>>> jira/browse/IGNITE-4651 > >>>>>> - Renewed JDBC driver: https://issues.apache.org/ > >>>>>> jira/browse/IGNITE-4922 > >>>>>> - Collocation based routing of SQL queries: > >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/ > >>>>>> jira/browse/IGNITE-4510, > >>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4509 > >>>>>> - > >>>>>> > >>>>>> 3. .NET: > >>>>>> - Peer-class loading: https://issues.apache.org/ > >>>>>> jira/browse/IGNITE-2492 > >>>>>> - SQLDependency: https://issues.apache.org/ > >>> jira/browse/IGNITE-2657 > >>>>>> > >>>>>> 4. C++: > >>>>>> - Compute Grid: https://issues.apache.org/ > >>> jira/browse/IGNITE-3574 > >>>>>> > >>>>>> 5. ML Grid: > >>>>>> - Linear regression algorithms: https://issues.apache.org/ > >>>>>> jira/browse/IGNITE-5012 > >>>>>> - K-means clustering: https://issues.apache.org/ > >>>>>> jira/browse/IGNITE-5113 > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Please join the thread and share your thoughts, ideas and concerns. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> — > >>>>>> Denis > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> -- > >>>>> Best Regards, Vyacheslav > >>>>> > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Best Regards, Vyacheslav > >>> > >> > >
