I have went through my issues and moved most of them to 2.1.

However, the following looks very important: https://issues.apache.org/
jira/browse/IGNITE-4354 DML: BinaryObjectBuilder does not sort fields in
some cases

Alexander Paschenko, I think you have worked on field sorting, can you have
a look?

On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 3:23 PM, Vladimir Ozerov <voze...@gridgain.com>
wrote:

> I am almost done with DDL. It will be available for review in the nearest
> time.
>
> On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 1:38 PM, Vladimir Ozerov <voze...@gridgain.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Convenient filter to view your tickets (you must be logged in to JIRA):
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20IGNITE%20AND%
> > 20fixVersion%20%3D%202.0%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20AND%20(
> > assignee%20%3D%20currentUser()%20OR%20reporter%20%3D%
> > 20currentUser())%20ORDER%20BY%20created%20ASC
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 1:34 PM, Vladimir Ozerov <voze...@gridgain.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Folks,
> >>
> >> I would also encourage you to review all 2,0 tickets that are either
> >> assigned to you or submitted by you and move them to the next version
> (2.1)
> >> if you cannot complete them in the nearest time. Currently we have 554
> >> opened tickets for 2.0. Let's make sure that we have about several
> dozens
> >> in the nearest time.
> >>
> >> Thank you.
> >>
> >> On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 12:58 PM, Вадим Опольский <vaopols...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hello community!
> >>>
> >>> Denis,  issue IGNITE-1794
> >>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-1794> - Hibernate 5
> >>> Support
> >>> has been ready for review from 24 March.
> >>>
> >>> The tests in Team City executed successfully.
> >>>
> >>> Vadim Opolski
> >>>
> >>> 2017-04-06 5:04 GMT+03:00 Denis Magda <dma...@apache.org>:
> >>>
> >>> > *Denis Magda:*
> >>> > IGNITE-1192 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-1192> -
> >>> Provide
> >>> > integration with Spring Data
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> > Will be finished and merged by the code freeze date. I’m on a
> business
> >>> > trip now and don’t have extra time to complete the feature.
> >>> >
> >>> > Plus, following your template these are additional tickets:
> >>> >
> >>> > *Alexey Kuznetsov*
> >>> > IGNITE-4349 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4349> -
> >>> Discontinue
> >>> > the schema-import utility
> >>> >
> >>> > *Sergey Chugunov*
> >>> > IGNITE-4536 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4536> -
> >>> Update
> >>> > metrics for new offheap storage
> >>> >
> >>> > *Nikita Ivanov*
> >>> > IGNITE-4572 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4572> -
> >>> Machine
> >>> > Learning: Develop distributed algebra support for dense and sparse
> data
> >>> > sets.
> >>> >
> >>> > *Roman Shtykh*
> >>> > IGNITE-4539 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4539> -
> >>> > RocketMQ Data Streamer
> >>> >
> >>> > *Vadim Opolski*
> >>> > IGNITE-1794 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-1794> -
> >>> > Hibernate 5 Support
> >>> >
> >>> > —
> >>> > Denis
> >>> >
> >>> > On Apr 5, 2017, at 9:39 PM, Dmitriy Setrakyan <dsetrak...@apache.org
> >
> >>> > wrote:
> >>> >
> >>> > Guys,
> >>> >
> >>> > Please provide a status underneath every ticket listed below, so we
> >>> can get
> >>> > a full picture in one email thread:
> >>> >
> >>> > *Alexey Goncharuk:*
> >>> > IGNITE-3477 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3477> -
> >>> Rework
> >>> > offheap storage
> >>> > IGNITE-4337 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4337> -
> >>> > Introduce
> >>> > persistence interface to allow build reliable persistence plugins
> >>> >
> >>> > *Alexander Menshikov:*
> >>> > IGNITE-4699 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4699> -
> >>> > Introduce
> >>> > custom configurable executors.
> >>> >
> >>> > *Denis Magda:*
> >>> > IGNITE-1192 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-1192> -
> >>> Provide
> >>> > integration with Spring Data
> >>> >
> >>> > *Dmitriy Karachentsev:*
> >>> > IGNITE-4477 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4477> -
> Fix
> >>> > IgniteFuture.listen() and IgniteFuture.chain() semantics
> >>> >
> >>> > *Ilya Lantukh:*
> >>> > IGNITE-4535 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4535>
> >>> > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4535>- Add option to
> >>> store
> >>> > deserialized values on-heap
> >>> >
> >>> > *Ivan Rakov:*
> >>> > IGNITE-4534 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4534> -
> >>> > Implement
> >>> > offheap eviction policies based on page memory
> >>> >
> >>> > *Sergey Kalashnikov:*
> >>> > IGNITE-3595 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3595> -
> >>> Improve
> >>> > Enum fields handling in SQL.
> >>> >
> >>> > *Sergi Vladykin:*
> >>> > IGNITE-3869 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3869> -
> >>> Reduce
> >>> > number of temporary objects produced by H2
> >>> >
> >>> > *Taras Ledkov:*
> >>> > IGNITE-3469 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3469> -
> Get
> >>> rid
> >>> > of deprecated APIs and entities
> >>> >
> >>> > *Vladimir Ozerov:*
> >>> > IGNITE-4565 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4565> -
> >>> Support
> >>> > CREATE INDEX DDL statements
> >>> >
> >>> > *Yakov Zdanov:*
> >>> > IGNITE-4799 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4799> -
> >>> Remove
> >>> > TcpDiscoverySpi.heartbeatsFrequency parameter
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> > *Denis*, we still have 5 issues that are *unassigned*. Are they
> >>> supposed to
> >>> > be getting into release?
> >>> >
> >>> > IGNITE-3488 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3488> -
> >>> Prohibit
> >>> > null as name in all the components (cache name first of all).
> >>> > IGNITE-3596 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3596> -
> >>> Hadoop
> >>> > edition can't be compiled against spark 2.0.0
> >>> > IGNITE-4794 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4794> -
> >>> > Reconsider
> >>> > CachePeekMode.ONHEAP
> >>> > IGNITE-2202 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2202> -
> >>> Local
> >>> > server query result doesn't include versions in entries
> >>> > IGNITE-2398 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2398> -
> >>> .NET:
> >>> > Change default mapper behavior
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> > D.
> >>> >
> >>> > On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 6:07 PM, Denis Magda <dma...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >>> >
> >>> > Dmitriy,
> >>> >
> >>> > You can find all the required tickets with contributors assigned
> here:
> >>> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/
> Apache+Ignite+2.0#
> >>> > ApacheIgnite2.0-Requiredtickets <https://cwiki.apache.org/
> >>> > confluence/display/IGNITE/Apache+Ignite+2.0#ApacheIgnite2.0-
> >>> > Requiredtickets>
> >>> >
> >>> > In short, Alex G., Sergi, Vovan, Taras, Yakov, Sam, etc. (almost all
> >>> the
> >>> > community) please share your readiness with the rest of the
> community.
> >>> >
> >>> > —
> >>> > Denis
> >>> >
> >>> > On Apr 5, 2017, at 9:03 PM, Dmitriy Setrakyan <dsetrak...@apache.org
> >
> >>> >
> >>> > wrote:
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> > Denis,
> >>> >
> >>> > I think it will be worth while to list all the tickets by status
> >>> together
> >>> > with a name of the engineer assigned to it. This way most folks
> >>> involved
> >>> > would provide a response sooner.
> >>> >
> >>> > What do you think?
> >>> >
> >>> > D.
> >>> >
> >>> > On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 1:27 PM, Denis Magda <dma...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >>> >
> >>> > Igniters,
> >>> >
> >>> > What’s the overall status of 2.0 release? I see that many tickets
> >>> >
> >>> > related
> >>> >
> >>> > to the page memory [1] are still in the open state and, looks like,
> >>> this
> >>> > new memory architecture has not been fully merged yet. In addition, a
> >>> >
> >>> > new
> >>> >
> >>> > version of H2 has to be released prior to 2.0.
> >>> >
> >>> > All this threatens the release schedule we agreed on. According to
> the
> >>> > plan the next week is a week of code freeze:
> >>> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/
> Apache+Ignite+2.0#
> >>> > ApacheIgnite2.0-Releasephases <https://cwiki.apache.org/
> >>> > confluence/display/IGNITE/Apache+Ignite+2.0#
> >>> >
> >>> > ApacheIgnite2.0-Releasephases>
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3477 <
> >>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3477>
> >>> >
> >>> > —
> >>> > Denis
> >>> >
> >>> > On Mar 31, 2017, at 4:02 AM, Vladimir Ozerov <voze...@gridgain.com>
> >>> >
> >>> > wrote:
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> > Another big merge - now almost all our setters on public
> configuration
> >>> > return "this" instance to allow for convenient chaining [1]. Big
> >>> > thanks to *Andrew
> >>> > Mashenkov* for making this happen.
> >>> > Ideally I would also try to replace "set(Collection<Something>)"
> with "
> >>> > set(Something...)". This should make configuration even more easier.
> >>> >
> >>> > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4564
> >>> >
> >>> > On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 2:18 AM, Denis Magda <dma...@apache.org>
> >>> >
> >>> > wrote:
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> > Vovan,
> >>> >
> >>> > I expect to finalize and merge Spring Data Integration by the code
> >>> >
> >>> > freeze
> >>> >
> >>> > time (April 14th):
> >>> > IGNITE-1192Provide integration with Spring Data <
> >>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-1192>
> >>> >
> >>> > —
> >>> > Denis
> >>> >
> >>> > On Mar 30, 2017, at 3:10 PM, Vladimir Ozerov <voze...@gridgain.com>
> >>> >
> >>> > wrote:
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> > Igniters,
> >>> >
> >>> > We are getting closer to proposed code freeze date. Could you please
> >>> >
> >>> > go
> >>> >
> >>> > through the list of required [1] tickets and provide brief update on
> >>> >
> >>> > where
> >>> >
> >>> > we are?
> >>> >
> >>> > As per myself, I am curerntly working on CREATE/DROP index feature
> >>> > stabilization and expect it to be ready for review on the next week.
> >>> >
> >>> > Vladimir.
> >>> >
> >>> > [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/
> >>> >
> >>> > Apache+Ignite+2.0
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> > On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 9:11 PM, nivanov <nivano...@gmail.com>
> >>> >
> >>> > wrote:
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> > I think we can make it on time to add IgniteML (a.k.a. distributed
> >>> >
> >>> > math) to
> >>> >
> >>> > 2.0 release pipeline.
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> > --
> >>> > View this message in context: http://apache-ignite-
> >>> > developers.2346864.n4.nabble.com/Apache-Ignite-2-0-Release-
> >>> > tp15690p15857.html
> >>> > Sent from the Apache Ignite Developers mailing list archive at
> >>> >
> >>> > Nabble.com.
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >
>

Reply via email to