Aleksey, Can you elaborate on which of the extra messages you observe?
--AG 2017-04-04 14:17 GMT+03:00 ALEKSEY KUZNETSOV <alkuznetsov...@gmail.com>: > any thoughts on one phase commit realization ? > > пн, 3 апр. 2017 г. в 19:35, ALEKSEY KUZNETSOV <alkuznetsov...@gmail.com>: > > > I've attached test that prints messages exchange . Which shows us that > > there are more messages then you declared in article. Perhaps, > > implementation has changed. > > I created it on base of IgniteOnePhaseCommitNearSelfTest > > > > пн, 3 апр. 2017 г. в 19:03, Dmitriy Setrakyan <dsetrak...@apache.org>: > > > > Aleksey, > > > > The blog describes the 1-phase commit at a high level, but I am still > > curious about the differences you found. Can you share them here? > > > > D. > > > > On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 2:11 AM, ALEKSEY KUZNETSOV < > > alkuznetsov...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > Regarding IgniteOnePhaseCommitNearSelfTest test , ignite's one phase > > > optimisation works not as you said. > > > I attached picture of message exchange. There are partial prepare phase > > > exists, along with finish phase. > > > > > > > > > > > > пн, 3 апр. 2017 г. в 10:55, Christos Erotocritou < > chris...@gridgain.com > > >: > > > > > >> As far as I know a partition is always allocated to a specific node > and > > >> does not span nodes. Ignite has default 1024 partitions on start that > > are > > >> split equally across nodes. > > >> > > >> > On 3 Apr 2017, at 08:10, ALEKSEY KUZNETSOV < > alkuznetsov...@gmail.com> > > >> wrote: > > >> > > > >> > in ur blog u texted belonging to the same partition is nessesary > for 1 > > >> > phase commit. But its not guarantee belonging to the same node. > > >> Partition > > >> > may span many nodes > > >> > > > >> > вс, 2 Апр 2017 г., 13:46 ALEKSEY KUZNETSOV < > alkuznetsov...@gmail.com > > >: > > >> > > > >> >> thank u ! > > >> >> > > >> >> пт, 31 Мар 2017 г., 21:06 Denis Magda <dma...@apache.org>: > > >> >> > > >> >> Here is a good blog post about 1phase commit impl in Ignite and its > > >> >> advantages: > > >> >> > > >> >> http://gridgain.blogspot.com/2014/09/one-phase-commit-fast- > > >> transactions-for.html > > >> >> < > > >> >> http://gridgain.blogspot.com/2014/09/one-phase-commit-fast- > > >> transactions-for.html > > >> >>> > > >> >> > > >> >> Took a reference to it from there: > > >> >> > > >> >> https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/transactions#section- > > >> two-phase-commit-2pc > > >> >> < > > >> >> https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/transactions#section- > > >> two-phase-commit-2pc > > >> >>> > > >> >> > > >> >> — > > >> >> Denis > > >> >> > > >> >>> On Mar 31, 2017, at 12:27 PM, Dmitriy Setrakyan < > > >> dsetrak...@apache.org> > > >> >> wrote: > > >> >>> > > >> >>> On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 9:25 AM, ALEKSEY KUZNETSOV < > > >> >> alkuznetsov...@gmail.com > > >> >>>> wrote: > > >> >>> > > >> >>>> Igniters! What is the point of one phase optimisation? > > >> >>>> > > >> >>> > > >> >>> Performance > > >> >> > > >> >> -- > > >> >> > > >> >> *Best Regards,* > > >> >> > > >> >> *Kuznetsov Aleksey* > > >> >> > > >> > -- > > >> > > > >> > *Best Regards,* > > >> > > > >> > *Kuznetsov Aleksey* > > >> > > > -- > > > > > > *Best Regards,* > > > > > > *Kuznetsov Aleksey* > > > > > > > -- > > > > *Best Regards,* > > > > *Kuznetsov Aleksey* > > > -- > > *Best Regards,* > > *Kuznetsov Aleksey* >
