Savepoints marked for 2.1, exceptions for 2.0. Do you want me to make exceptions first?
2017-03-29 11:24 GMT+03:00 Дмитрий Рябов <somefire...@gmail.com>: > Finish savepoints or flag&exceptions for atomic operations? > Not sure about savepoints. Exceptions - yes. https://issues.apache. > org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2313 isn't it? > > 2017-03-29 2:12 GMT+03:00 Denis Magda <dma...@apache.org>: > >> If we want to make the exception based approach the default one then the >> task has to be released in 2.0. >> >> Dmitriy Ryabov, do you think you can finish it (dev, review, QA) by the >> code freeze data (April 14)? >> >> — >> Denis >> >> > On Mar 28, 2017, at 11:57 AM, Dmitriy Setrakyan <dsetrak...@apache.org> >> wrote: >> > >> > On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 11:54 AM, Sergi Vladykin < >> sergi.vlady...@gmail.com> >> > wrote: >> > >> >> I think updating an Atomic cache from within a transaction perfectly >> makes >> >> sense. For example for some kind of operations logging and so forth. >> Still >> >> I agree that this can be error prone and forbidden by default. I agree >> with >> >> Yakov that by default we should throw an exception and have some kind >> of >> >> flag (on cache or on TX?) to be able to explicitly enable this >> behavior. >> >> >> > >> > >> > Agree, this sounds like a good idea. >> >> >
