Hi Rishi,

I want to fix the bug first. It takes a bit longer than I thought, but I
should finish it over the weekend.

-Val

On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 4:13 AM, Rishi Yagnik <rishiyag...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Val,
>
> Did you chance to look into session handling issue ?
>
> Thanks,
>
> On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 3:37 PM, Rishi Yagnik <rishiyag...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Val,
> >
> > Do you think I can test a fix in 1.9 RC releases ? How are you planning
> to
> > release a fix ?
> >
> > Did you also look into problem where storing xsrf token in Ignite returns
> > an exception and does not behave as expected ?
> >
> > In SecurityConfig.java use HttpSessionCsrfTokenRepository with following
> > code -
> >
> > .csrfTokenRepository(csrfTokenRepository())
> >
> > private CsrfTokenRepository csrfTokenRepository() {
> >     HttpSessionCsrfTokenRepository repository = new
> HttpSessionCsrfTokenRepository();
> >     repository.setHeaderName("X-XSRF-TOKEN");
> >     return repository;
> > }
> >
> > Thank you for all your help,
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 2:34 PM, Valentin Kulichenko <
> > valentin.kuliche...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Rishi,
> >>
> >> I got to the bottom of it. Basically, the session is replaced in Spring
> >> filter, but caching happens based on the old version which doesn't have
> >> security attributes. The fix is going to be very easy, I will do it
> >> tomorrow.
> >>
> >> -Val
> >>
> >> On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 7:34 PM, Rishi Yagnik <rishiyag...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Val,
> >> >
> >> > Did you get chance to play around with the code ?
> >> >
> >> > Thanks,
> >> >
> >> > On Sun, Mar 5, 2017 at 7:25 PM, Rishi Yagnik <rishiyag...@gmail.com>
> >> > wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > Val,
> >> > >
> >> > > Adding a filter before csrf filter will invoke the custom ignite
> >> filter.
> >> > >
> >> > > Declare a custom filter class extends it with websession filter
> >> > >
> >> > > public class CustomWebSessionFilter extends WebSessionFilter {
> >> > >
> >> > >          private static boolean igniteInitialize = false
> >> > >
> >> > > @Override public void doFilter(ServletRequest req, ServletResponse
> >> res,
> >> > > FilterChain chain)
> >> > >             throws IOException, ServletException {
> >> > >         if(!igniteInitialize) {
> >> > >             super.init(new FilterConfig() {
> >> > >                 @Override
> >> > >                 public String getFilterName() {
> >> > >                     return "CustomWebSessionFilter";
> >> > >                 }
> >> > >
> >> > >                 @Override
> >> > >                 public ServletContext getServletContext() {
> >> > >                     return req.getServletContext();
> >> > >                 }
> >> > >
> >> > >                 @Override
> >> > >                 public String getInitParameter(String name) {
> >> > >                     return null;
> >> > >                 }
> >> > >
> >> > >                 @Override
> >> > >                 public Enumeration<String> getInitParameterNames() {
> >> > >                     return null;
> >> > >                 }
> >> > >             });
> >> > >             igniteInitialize = true;
> >> > >         }
> >> > >         super.doFilter(req,res,chain);
> >> > >     }
> >> > > }
> >> > >
> >> > > And in SecurityConfig.java add following line to invoke filter
> before
> >> > > Ignite Web Session filter -
> >> > >
> >> > >  .addFilterBefore(new ArWebSessionFilter(), CsrfFilter.class)
> >> > >
> >> > > Hope it helps..
> >> > >
> >> > > Thanks,
> >> > >
> >> > > On Sun, Mar 5, 2017 at 1:28 PM, Valentin Kulichenko <
> >> > > valentin.kuliche...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > >> Rishi,
> >> > >>
> >> > >> Can you please share how you forced Ignite filter to be invoked
> >> before
> >> > >> security filter?
> >> > >>
> >> > >> -Val
> >> > >>
> >> > >> On Sun, Mar 5, 2017 at 11:20 AM, Rishi Yagnik <
> rishiyag...@gmail.com
> >> >
> >> > >> wrote:
> >> > >>
> >> > >> > Hi Val,
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > Thanks for the response, we have executed ignite filter before
> >> spring
> >> > >> > security filter but somehow the ignite filter does not do the job
> >> of
> >> > >> > setting spring principle context.
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > As a result even though we have spring principle in session,
> spring
> >> > >> filter
> >> > >> > does not recognize it and sends us back to log in page.
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > I think there s some more work needed here to change the filter
> and
> >> > make
> >> > >> > it work with spring boot application.
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > Take Care,
> >> > >> > Rishi
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > > On Mar 5, 2017, at 10:16 AM, Valentin Kulichenko <
> >> > >> > valentin.kuliche...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > >> > >
> >> > >> > > Hi Rishi,
> >> > >> > >
> >> > >> > > I did some debugging. Apparently, the reason for this behavior
> is
> >> > that
> >> > >> > > Spring Security filter resides before Ignite's filter in the
> >> chain
> >> > >> list.
> >> > >> > I
> >> > >> > > think that eventually this should be fixed in the product, but
> in
> >> > the
> >> > >> > > meantime there must be a way to work around the problem by
> >> > controlling
> >> > >> > the
> >> > >> > > order. Do you know how this can be done in Spring Boot?
> >> > >> > >
> >> > >> > > -Val
> >> > >> > >
> >> > >> > >> On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 9:31 AM, Rishi Yagnik <
> >> > rishiyag...@gmail.com
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > wrote:
> >> > >> > >>
> >> > >> > >> Hi Val,
> >> > >> > >>
> >> > >> > >> Sorry for pestering, thanks for all your help.
> >> > >> > >>
> >> > >> > >> Rishi
> >> > >> > >>
> >> > >> > >> On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 7:22 PM, Valentin Kulichenko <
> >> > >> > >> valentin.kuliche...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > >> > >>
> >> > >> > >>> Hi Rishi,
> >> > >> > >>>
> >> > >> > >>> Sorry, not yet. But this on my short list of TODOs, will try
> to
> >> > >> give an
> >> > >> > >>> update as soon as possible.
> >> > >> > >>>
> >> > >> > >>> -Val
> >> > >> > >>>
> >> > >> > >>> On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 7:47 AM, Rishi Yagnik <
> >> > >> rishiyag...@gmail.com>
> >> > >> > >>> wrote:
> >> > >> > >>>
> >> > >> > >>>> Hi Val,
> >> > >> > >>>>
> >> > >> > >>>> any update on session replication issue ?
> >> > >> > >>>>
> >> > >> > >>>> Thanks,
> >> > >> > >>>> Rishi
> >> > >> > >>>>
> >> > >> > >>>> On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 8:07 AM, Rishi Yagnik <
> >> > >> rishiyag...@gmail.com>
> >> > >> > >>>> wrote:
> >> > >> > >>>>
> >> > >> > >>>>> Thanks Val for looking into it.
> >> > >> > >>>>>
> >> > >> > >>>>> On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 9:32 PM, Valentin Kulichenko <
> >> > >> > >>>>> valentin.kuliche...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > >> > >>>>>
> >> > >> > >>>>>> Hi Rishi,
> >> > >> > >>>>>>
> >> > >> > >>>>>> Got it, I think I'm reproducing the issue. I'll take a
> look
> >> and
> >> > >> let
> >> > >> > >>> you
> >> > >> > >>>>>> know my findings soon.
> >> > >> > >>>>>>
> >> > >> > >>>>>> -Val
> >> > >> > >>>>>>
> >> > >> > >>>>>> On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 7:27 PM, Rishi Yagnik <
> >> > >> > >> rishiyag...@gmail.com>
> >> > >> > >>>>>> wrote:
> >> > >> > >>>>>>
> >> > >> > >>>>>>> Hi Val,
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>
> >> > >> > >>>>>>> The issue will occur in cluster environment, please setup
> >> the
> >> > >> > >> spring
> >> > >> > >>>>>> boot
> >> > >> > >>>>>>> on 2 different host with LB (F5 OR Reverse proxy) in
> front
> >> and
> >> > >> try
> >> > >> > >>> to
> >> > >> > >>>>>>> login.
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>
> >> > >> > >>>>>>> In cluster environment, Spring security does not
> recognize
> >> the
> >> > >> > >>> session
> >> > >> > >>>>>> on
> >> > >> > >>>>>>> the host you are not logged in, as a result, spring
> >> security
> >> > >> will
> >> > >> > >>>>>> redirect
> >> > >> > >>>>>>> to login url however the correct behavior should be that
> >> user
> >> > >> > >> would
> >> > >> > >>>> stay
> >> > >> > >>>>>>> logged in with session replication.
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>
> >> > >> > >>>>>>> Do let me know if you need more information.
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>
> >> > >> > >>>>>>> Thanks,
> >> > >> > >>>>>>> Rishi
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>
> >> > >> > >>>>>>> On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 7:08 PM, Valentin Kulichenko <
> >> > >> > >>>>>>> valentin.kuliche...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>> Hi Rishi,
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>> I was able to build and run the application. Can you
> give
> >> > some
> >> > >> > >>>>>>> description
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>> on what should I test to understand the issue? What
> >> exactly
> >> > >> > >> didn't
> >> > >> > >>>>>> work
> >> > >> > >>>>>>> for
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>> you?
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>> -Val
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>> On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 10:52 AM, Valentin Kulichenko <
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>> valentin.kuliche...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>> Hi Rishi,
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>> Thanks, I'll take a look.
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>> -Val
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>> On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 9:07 AM, Rishi Yagnik <
> >> > >> > >>>>>> rishiyag...@gmail.com>
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>> Hi Val,
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>> As promised, please find attached code for spring boot
> >> > >> > >>>> integration
> >> > >> > >>>>>>> with
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>> spring security along with Ignite.
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>> Some more information on project -
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>   - It is a maven project ( Ignite 1.7.0, SB 1.4.3 )
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>   - spring security integrated with boot project along
> >> with
> >> > >> > >>>> ignite
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>   - HttpSessionCookieCsrfTokenRepository does not
> work,
> >> > >> > >> gives
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>   intermediate errors on single instance so used
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>> CookieCsrfTokenRepository
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>   for CSRF token, again I think we need a fix here
> from
> >> > >> > >>> Ignite.
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>> I cant reproduce this errors while I am running on
> >> single
> >> > >> > >>>> instance,
> >> > >> > >>>>>>> you
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>> need to run this app on 2 spring boot instance having
> >> proxy
> >> > >> > >> in
> >> > >> > >>>>>> front (
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>> F5,
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>> OR any proxy ) with round robin fashion ( no sticky
> >> session
> >> > >> > >> on
> >> > >> > >>> F5
> >> > >> > >>>>>> OR
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>> proxies ).
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>> We were thinking with round robin the user session
> will
> >> > >> > >> active
> >> > >> > >>>>>> since
> >> > >> > >>>>>>> we
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>> used session replication on backend.
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>> Do let me know if you need more information here.
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>> Rishi
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 9:57 PM, Rishi Yagnik <
> >> > >> > >>>>>> rishiyag...@gmail.com>
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>> Val,
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>> My SB sample project is ready however I have asked
> for
> >> an
> >> > >> > >>>>>> approval to
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>> submit sample project to you, it would take day or
> two.
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>> I will keep you posted.
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for all your help,
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 3:51 PM, Rishi Yagnik <
> >> > >> > >>>>>> rishiyag...@gmail.com
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Let me build an example app for you and send it
> >> across to
> >> > >> > >>> you.
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 3:28 PM, Valentin
> Kulichenko <
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> valentin.kuliche...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Rishi,
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> No I don't, and I think that's what we should start
> >> > with.
> >> > >> > >> I
> >> > >> > >>>>>> want to
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> understand a use case that is currently not
> supported
> >> > (if
> >> > >> > >>> any)
> >> > >> > >>>>>> and
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>> then
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> find the best solution. And I would like to reuse
> >> > existing
> >> > >> > >>>> code
> >> > >> > >>>>>> as
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> much as
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> possible.
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you have any code that reproduces the problem
> you
> >> had
> >> > >> > >> and
> >> > >> > >>>> how
> >> > >> > >>>>>>> you
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> tried
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> to utilize current web session clustering? Can you
> >> share
> >> > >> > >> it
> >> > >> > >>>> with
> >> > >> > >>>>>>> us?
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> -Val
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 11:28 AM, Rishi Yagnik <
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>> rishiyag...@gmail.com>
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Val,
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am working on SB platform with spring security
> >> and we
> >> > >> > >>>> found
> >> > >> > >>>>>> out
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> that the
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> web session filter ignite provides does not work
> for
> >> > >> > >>> session
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> management on
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2 node spring boot cluster.
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Somehow, spring security filter kicks in result in
> >> some
> >> > >> > >>>> weird
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>> errors
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> with
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> web session filter.
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> So making compatible with spring security somehow,
> >> we
> >> > >> > >> need
> >> > >> > >>>> to
> >> > >> > >>>>>>> write
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> implementation on spring session.
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you have any test cases that says web session
> >> filter
> >> > >> > >>>> would
> >> > >> > >>>>>>> work
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> with
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> spring security on boot platform ?
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 1:03 PM, Valentin
> >> Kulichenko <
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> valentin.kuliche...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Rishi,
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can you please take a look at web session
> >> clustering
> >> > >> > >>>> feature
> >> > >> > >>>>>>> [1]
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> provided
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by Ignite? I'm looking at Spring Session docs and
> >> it
> >> > >> > >>> seems
> >> > >> > >>>>>> to
> >> > >> > >>>>>>> me
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> it does
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> exactly the same - replaces HttpSession with
> custom
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>> implementation
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> that
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> has
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a backend storage. If it doesn't provide any
> >> > >> > >> additional
> >> > >> > >>>> API
> >> > >> > >>>>>> or
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> functionality, I'm not sure I understand the
> >> benefit
> >> > >> > >> of
> >> > >> > >>>> this
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> feature.
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Let me know if I'm missing something.
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://apacheignite-mix.
> >> > >> > >>> readme.io/docs/web-session-
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>> clustering
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Val
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 2:41 PM, Rishi Yagnik <
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> rishiyag...@gmail.com>
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I would like to discuss session replication /
> fail
> >> > >> > >>> over
> >> > >> > >>>>>>> design
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>> on
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> spring
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> boot platform and wanted to find what is the
> best
> >> > >> > >> out
> >> > >> > >>> to
> >> > >> > >>>>>> get
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> started
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> here ?
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Possible approaches are as follows -
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   - Make use of Spring Session for session
> >> > >> > >>> replication
> >> > >> > >>>>>> and
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>> fail
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> over
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   - Extend the web session filter and make it
> work
> >> > >> > >> on
> >> > >> > >>>>>> spring
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> boot
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   application
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am thinking that best approach would be to get
> >> > >> > >>> started
> >> > >> > >>>>>> here
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> with
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> spring
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> session design however I am open for feedback
> >> here.
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rishi Yagnik
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rishi Yagnik
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> --
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Rishi Yagnik
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>> --
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>> Rishi Yagnik
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>> --
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>> Rishi Yagnik
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>>
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>>
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>
> >> > >> > >>>>>>> --
> >> > >> > >>>>>>> Rishi Yagnik
> >> > >> > >>>>>>>
> >> > >> > >>>>>>
> >> > >> > >>>>>
> >> > >> > >>>>>
> >> > >> > >>>>>
> >> > >> > >>>>> --
> >> > >> > >>>>> Rishi Yagnik
> >> > >> > >>>>>
> >> > >> > >>>>
> >> > >> > >>>>
> >> > >> > >>>>
> >> > >> > >>>> --
> >> > >> > >>>> Rishi Yagnik
> >> > >> > >>>>
> >> > >> > >>>
> >> > >> > >>
> >> > >> > >>
> >> > >> > >>
> >> > >> > >> --
> >> > >> > >> Rishi Yagnik
> >> > >> > >>
> >> > >> >
> >> > >>
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > --
> >> > > Rishi Yagnik
> >> > >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Rishi Yagnik
> >> >
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Rishi Yagnik
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Rishi Yagnik
>

Reply via email to