Anton,

IGNITE-4670 is almost ready. I believe, there is nothing to worry about.

Best Regards,
Igor

On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 5:16 PM, Alexander Paschenko <
alexander.a.pasche...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> There are some questions regarding IGNITE-4169 - probably some design
> approval will be required from Dmitry S. However, chances are good
> that we'll make it in time.
>
> - Alex
>
> 2017-02-16 14:48 GMT+03:00 Anton Vinogradov <avinogra...@gridgain.com>:
> > Igniters,
> >
> > We're planning to have a code freeze tomorrow, Feb 17 19.00 MSK.
> > Here's the list of issues we especially expect to be done in 1.9:
> >
> > IGNITE-4106 SQL: parallelize sql queries over cache local partitions
> Andrew
> > Mashenkov
> > IGNITE-4670 CPP: Implement LoadCache method Task Igor Sapego
> > IGNITE-3860 Improve distributed SQL support. Sergi Vladykin
> > IGNITE-3013 Support sorted merge index for SQL Sergi Vladykin
> > IGNITE-4212 Ignite Benchmarking Simplification and Automation Oleg
> Ostanin
> > IGNITE-4169 Data streamer mode for DML Alexander Paschenko
> > IGNITE-3710 Upgrade ignite-spark module to Spark 2.0 Evgenii Zhuravlev
> > IGNITE-1794 Ignite should support Hibernate 5 Mykola Pereyma
> > IGNITE-4523 Allow distributed SQL query execution over explicit set of
> > partitions Alexei Scherbakov
> >
> > Guys, please confirm that you will be able to complete listed tasks till
> > Feb 17 19.00 MSK.
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 2:31 PM, Anton Vinogradov <
> avinogra...@gridgain.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Denis,
> >>
> >> Evgenii Zhuravlev going to fix this issue. I'll provide him help if
> >> necessarry.
> >>
> >> On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 8:03 PM, Denis Magda <dma...@apache.org> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Anton,
> >>>
> >>> The implementation is correct and was reviewed by Val long time ago.
> The
> >>> only issue that is left is the compilation in *TeamCity* only.
> >>> You fixed it for one scala version and now should simply do the same
> for
> >>> other scala version by adding a new suite to TeamCity and adjusting
> the pom.
> >>>
> >>> —
> >>> Denis
> >>>
> >>> > On Feb 15, 2017, at 1:20 AM, Anton Vinogradov <
> avinogra...@gridgain.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>> >
> >>> > Denis,
> >>> >
> >>> > I don't know what is the plan for this issue.
> >>> > You asked me to fix compilation and thats what I done :) , but I'm
> not
> >>> sure
> >>> > that issue implemented in proper way. I don't like changes I've done,
> >>> they
> >>> > looks redundant although it works.
> >>> > Do we have somebody more familiar with spark inside the community?
> >>> > We have to review what we already done and figure out what's left.
> >>> >
> >>> > On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 5:01 AM, Denis Magda <dma...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >>> >
> >>> >> Continuing Spark related topic...
> >>> >>
> >>> >> This ticket definitely must be included in 1.9:
> >>> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3710 <
> >>> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3710>
> >>> >>
> >>> >> We can’t longer afford torture Ignite Shared RDD users who have to
> use
> >>> an
> >>> >> outdated Spark version.
> >>> >>
> >>> >> Anton, could you finalize it this week? As far as I remember, the
> only
> >>> >> thing that is left is to add a missing test suite to Team City.
> >>> >>
> >>> >> —
> >>> >> Denis
> >>> >>
> >>> >>> On Feb 14, 2017, at 5:00 PM, Denis Magda <dma...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> Reviewed and merged the first (!) Ignite Shared RDD examples
> >>> contributed
> >>> >> by Manish:
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4526
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> Java:
> >>> >>> https://github.com/apache/ignite/blob/
> b461cb47882861356ede58775bd9e2
> >>> >> 53dcf26202/examples/src/main/java8/org/apache/ignite/example
> >>> s/java8/spark/
> >>> >> SharedRDDExample.java
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> Scala:
> >>> >>> https://github.com/apache/ignite/blob/
> b461cb47882861356ede58775bd9e2
> >>> >> 53dcf26202/examples/src/main/scala/org/apache/ignite/
> >>> >> scalar/examples/spark/ScalarSharedRDDExample.scala
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> Manish, thanks for making the life of Apache Ignite users easier.
> No
> >>> >> they can refer to your examples while learning Ignite Shared RDD
> API.
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> —
> >>> >>> Denis
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>>> On Feb 14, 2017, at 1:21 AM, Anton Vinogradov <
> >>> avinogra...@gridgain.com>
> >>> >> wrote:
> >>> >>>>
> >>> >>>>>
> >>> >>>>> Can we push to 1.9 and then merge/rebase to master?
> >>> >>>>
> >>> >>>>
> >>> >>>> Yes, that's *correct *too, but only *megre *should be used.
> >>> >>>>
> >>> >>>> On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 12:19 PM, Vladimir Ozerov <
> >>> voze...@gridgain.com
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>>> wrote:
> >>> >>>>
> >>> >>>>> Can we push to 1.9 and then merge/rebase to master? It should be
> >>> more
> >>> >>>>> reliable than cherry-picking.
> >>> >>>>>
> >>> >>>>> On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 12:15 PM, Anton Vinogradov <
> >>> >>>>> avinogra...@gridgain.com
> >>> >>>>>> wrote:
> >>> >>>>>
> >>> >>>>>> Denis,
> >>> >>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>> Merge to the master first and then cherry-pick to 1.9 from there
> >>> is a
> >>> >>>>>> *correct
> >>> >>>>>> *case.
> >>> >>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>> On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 5:24 AM, Dmitriy Setrakyan <
> >>> >>>>> dsetrak...@apache.org>
> >>> >>>>>> wrote:
> >>> >>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>> Thanks, Denis!
> >>> >>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>> On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 5:49 PM, Denis Magda <
> dma...@apache.org>
> >>> >>>>> wrote:
> >>> >>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>>> Well, merged Kubernetes integration to the master and
> >>> cherry-picked
> >>> >>>>> to
> >>> >>>>>>>> 1.9. The docs and getting started for readme.io to be done
> soon.
> >>> >>>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>>> —
> >>> >>>>>>>> Denis
> >>> >>>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>>>> On Feb 13, 2017, at 9:10 AM, Denis Magda <dma...@apache.org>
> >>> >>>>> wrote:
> >>> >>>>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>>>> Do I merge to the master first and then cherry-pick to 1.9
> from
> >>> >>>>>> there?
> >>> >>>>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>>>> —
> >>> >>>>>>>>> Denis
> >>> >>>>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>>>>> On Feb 13, 2017, at 8:21 AM, Anton Vinogradov <
> >>> >>>>>>> avinogra...@gridgain.com>
> >>> >>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>>>>> Igniters,
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>>>>> We're starting release stabilization process.
> >>> >>>>>>>>>> Branch 1.9 created and equals to master branch right now.
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>>>>> Please make sure that your changes will be merged to both
> >>> >>>>> branches:
> >>> >>>>>>>>>> *ignite-1.9* and *master*.
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 4:53 PM, Sergey Kalashnikov <
> >>> >>>>>>>> zkilling...@gmail.com>
> >>> >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> Anton,
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> Here is the status for IGNITE-4523.
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> The work is completed, tests are OK.
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> Most of the changes were made by Alexey and were reviewed.
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> I only authored few last commits for which I would
> appreciate
> >>> a
> >>> >>>>>>> review.
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> The PR is https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/1508
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> Thank you
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> --
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> Sergey
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> 2017-02-09 23:58 GMT+03:00 Denis Magda <dma...@apache.org
> >:
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Anton,
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>> You can expect Kubernetes support from me in time.
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>> —
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Denis
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Feb 9, 2017, at 1:52 AM, Anton Vinogradov <
> a...@apache.org
> >>> >
> >>> >>>>>>> wrote:
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Igniters,
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> We're on a half way to Ignite 1.9.
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Development phase will be finished 17th of February.
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Here <https://cwiki.apache.org/
> confluence/display/IGNITE/
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Apache+Ignite+1.9> is
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> a status page for upcoming release.
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> According to this page we have some Issues we *especially
> >>> >>>>> *expect
> >>> >>>>>>> in
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> 1.9:
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-4106 SQL: parallelize sql queries over cache local
> >>> >>>>>>> partitions
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Andrew
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Mashenkov
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-3860 Improve distributed SQL support. Sergi
> Vladykin
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-4539 RocketMQ data streamer Roman Shtykh
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-4212 Ignite Benchmarking Simplification and
> >>> Automation
> >>> >>>>>> Oleg
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Ostanin
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-4523 Allow distributed SQL query execution over
> >>> explicit
> >>> >>>>>> set
> >>> >>>>>>>> of
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> partitions Alexei Scherbakov
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-3013 Support sorted merge index for SQL Sergi
> >>> Vladykin
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-4169 Data streamer mode for DML Alexander
> Paschenko
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-4670 CPP: Implement LoadCache method Unassigned
> (Igor
> >>> >>>>>>> Sapego,
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>> seems
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> you're the best person)
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-4159 Cloud Native Deployment of Apache Ignite
> using
> >>> >>>>>>> Kubernetes
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Denis
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Magda
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-4526 Add Spark Shared RDD examples Manish Mishra
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-4674 Ignite Web Console: Support DML queries
> Alexey
> >>> >>>>>>> Kuznetsov
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-1794 Ignite should support Hibernate 5 Mykola
> Pereyma
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Guys, please confirm that you will be able to complete
> >>> listed
> >>> >>>>>> tasks
> >>> >>>>>>>> by
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>> 17th
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> of February.
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 5:32 AM, Denis Magda <
> >>> dma...@apache.org
> >>> >>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Excellent news Roman! Please keep us posted.
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> —
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Feb 2, 2017, at 6:26 PM, Roman Shtykh
> >>> >>>>>>> <rsht...@yahoo.com.INVALID
> >>> >>>>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis,
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> RocketMQ data streamer implementation is almost ready.
> But
> >>> >>>>>> there
> >>> >>>>>>>> are
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> no
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> binaries in maven repositories now (it will be their 1st
> >>> >>>>> release
> >>> >>>>>>>> under
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Apache license). The release is very close to starting
> >>> voting
> >>> >>>>>> for,
> >>> >>>>>>>> so
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> hopefully it can be done in the middle of February.
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Roman
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wednesday, February 1, 2017 4:13 AM, Denis Magda <
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> dma...@apache.org> wrote:
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Igniters,
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Looks like 2.0 will be slightly delayed since the
> >>> community
> >>> >>>>>>>> requires
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> more time to make the new page memory architecture
> faster.
> >>> At
> >>> >>>>>> the
> >>> >>>>>>>> same
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>> time
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> we have a plenty of bug fixes and performance
> improvements
> >>> >>>>> that
> >>> >>>>>>> were
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>> merged
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> or close to be merged into the master and ready to be
> >>> >>>>> released.
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I propose to release all the changes we have in 1.9
> close
> >>> to
> >>> >>>>>> the
> >>> >>>>>>>> end
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> of
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> February.
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> According to the dev list discussions, we will be
> ready to
> >>> >>>>>>> release
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> performance optimizations done by Yakov and Sam close to
> >>> the
> >>> >>>>> end
> >>> >>>>>>> of
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> 2016
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> and many SQL improvements driven by multiple folks.
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In addition, this is what we might expect in 1.9:- SQL
> >>> >>>>>> execution
> >>> >>>>>>>> over
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> specific partitions (https://issues.apache.org/
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> jira/browse/IGNITE-4523
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>> ).
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alexey Scherbakov.- Spark version upgrade (
> >>> >>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> jira/browse/IGNITE-3710). Anton V.- Spark RDD Examples (
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4526).
> Manish
> >>> >>>>>>> Mishra.-
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rocket MQ data streamer (https://issues.apache.org/
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>> jira/browse/IGNITE-4539).
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Roman Shtykh.- Hibernate 5 support (
> >>> >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> jira/browse/IGNITE-1794). Mykola Pereyma.- .NET DML (
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4045).
> Pavel
> >>> >>>>>>>> Tupitsyn.-
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>> .NET
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Transaction Scope API (https://issues.apache.org/
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>> jira/browse/IGNITE-3430).
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Pavel Tupitsyn.- C++ Continuous queries (
> >>> >>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> jira/browse/IGNITE-1443). Igor Sapego.- Kubernetes
> Support
> >>> (
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4159).
> Denis
> >>> >>>>>> Magda.-
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> JDBC
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> batch mode for DML (https://issues.apache.org/
> >>> >>>>>>>> jira/browse/IGNITE-4269
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> ).
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alexander Paschenko.- Benchmarks automation (
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> jira/browse/IGNITE-4212). Oleg Ostanin.
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Guys, please confirm that you will be able to complete
> >>> listed
> >>> >>>>>>> tasks
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>> by
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the middle or by 20th of February. Anything else that is
> >>> not
> >>> >>>>> in
> >>> >>>>>>> the
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>> list?
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BTW, is there anyone who can take a role of the release
> >>> >>>>> manager
> >>> >>>>>>> for
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>> 1.9?
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> —Denis
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>>
> >>> >>>>>
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
>

Reply via email to