Yakov, Sam? Please join and share your thoughts.
— Denis > On Feb 10, 2017, at 7:08 AM, Александр Меньшиков <sharple...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Denis, thank you for information. I see JMH in pom file in benchmarks > module. So this must be removed or it's okay for micro-benchmarks? > > 2017-02-10 0:04 GMT+03:00 Denis Magda <dma...@apache.org>: > >> Alexander, >> >> We use Yardstick benchmarks for performance measurements of Ignite: >> https://github.com/apacheignite/yardstick-ignite <https://github.com/ >> apacheignite/yardstick-ignite> >> >> In 1.9 it will be much easier to execute the benchmarks directly from >> Apache Ignite bundle: >> http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.com/IGNITE-4212-Ignite- >> Benchmarking-Simplification-and-Automation-td13079.html < >> http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.com/IGNITE-4212-Ignite- >> Benchmarking-Simplification-and-Automation-td13079.html> >> >> As for GridCacheOffHeapTest it looks like a candidate for removal. *Yakov, >> Sam*, do we still need this test? >> >>> On Feb 9, 2017, at 6:25 AM, Александр Меньшиков <sharple...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> >>> Hello, everyone. >>> >>> GridCacheOffHeapTest is about the Off-heap benchmarks. >>> >>> As I understand it right now we haven't clear vision how better make >>> benchmarks in Ignite. >>> >>> If it's not true, please make me know. >>> >>> I think it's a good idea to make benchmarks with JMH framework. It can be >>> load with maven, right now it's part of OpenJDK project. But it will be >>> included in Java 9 like standart framework for benchmarks. >>> >>> So what do you think, Igniters? >> >>
