On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 12:19 PM, Sergey Kozlov <skoz...@gridgain.com> wrote:
> Hi > > Thanks Yakov and Vladimir! > > In general I'm ok for Yakov's suggestion though a bit not clear why > discovery by network mask will take long time. Is the discovery spi > single-threaded and Ignite processes the addresses consequentially? > Sergey, I think trying out every address within the mask will take a while. I like Yakov's suggestion as well. > > > On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 2:39 PM, Vladimir Ozerov <voze...@gridgain.com> > wrote: > > > +1 > > > > On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 2:11 PM, Yakov Zhdanov <yzhda...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > > > Agree with Vladimir. > > > > > > However, this functionality maybe useful in some cases. As far as I > > > remember we support port range notation, e.g. 127.0.0.1:47500..47509, > > but > > > we don't have this for addresses. If we implement this I would suggest > > the > > > same approach, e.g 192.168.0.1..5:47500 > > > > > > Thoughts? > > > > > > --Yakov > > > > > > > > > -- > Sergey Kozlov > GridGain Systems > www.gridgain.com >
