Now I am confused. What is the purpose of this configuration parameter? On Fri, Dec 30, 2016 at 1:15 PM, Denis Magda <dma...@apache.org> wrote:
> See Val’s concern in the discussion. I’m absolutely fine with ‘nodeName’. > > — > Denis > > > On Dec 30, 2016, at 1:13 PM, Dmitriy Setrakyan <dsetrak...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > > On Fri, Dec 30, 2016 at 1:12 PM, Denis Magda <dma...@apache.org> wrote: > > > >> What’s about ‘localNodeName’? > >> > > > > Why is it better than "nodeName"? Isn't it obvious that the name is for > the > > local node? > >