Hi I found two issues for 1.8: IGNITE-4304 ClusterTopologyCheckedException: Failed to send message because node left grid <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4304> IGNITE-4303 CacheClientBinaryQueryExample returns wrong result <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4303>
Could someone experienced take a look? On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 12:12 PM, Vladimir Ozerov <voze...@gridgain.com> wrote: > Folks, > > DML is merged to ignite-1.8, but according to JIRA reports several problems > with it were revealed. I propose to focus on DML finalization in ignite-1.8 > branch, and minimize other merges to it, targeting them for the next > release (1.9, 2.0?). > > Any objections? > > Vladimir. > > On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 7:25 PM, Igor Sapego <isap...@gridgain.com> wrote: > > > Denis, > > > > I've raised PRs and Vladimir has merged them into ignite-1.8. But now we > > have some > > failing ODBC tests in the branch. I'm currently working on them. There > is a > > ticket for > > that which you can track [1]. I'll add all my findings there. > > > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4288 > > > > Best Regards, > > Igor > > > > On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 7:08 PM, Denis Magda <dma...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > Alexander, > > > > > > Awesome news, thanks for making this happen! > > > > > > Igor S., have you merged all ODBC-DML-PHP/PDO related changes? Can I > > start > > > testing that PHP-PDO guidance [1] is correct? > > > > > > [1] https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/pdo-interoperability < > > > https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/pdo-interoperability> > > > > > > — > > > Denis > > > > > > > On Nov 23, 2016, at 12:01 AM, Alexander Paschenko < > > > alexander.a.pasche...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > Folks, > > > > > > > > Yesterday it'd been agreed with Sergi that DML branch is now good to > > > > be included into 1.8 branch that is to be created. > > > > > > > > Minor review fixes, should they be made, and test fixes will be > > > > incorporated into 1.8 as separate patches later. > > > > > > > > Also, it'd been agreed that, in order to deliver these new features > on > > > > time, two subtasks will be fixed in later releases (shortly): > > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4268 > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4269 > > > > > > > > On failing tests: > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2294? > > > focusedCommentId=15683377 > > > > > > > > - Alex > > > > > > > > 2016-11-22 11:29 GMT+03:00 Alexander Paschenko > > > > <alexander.a.pasche...@gmail.com>: > > > >> Vlad, > > > >> > > > >> Most likely today. > > > >> > > > >> - Alex > > > >> > > > >> 2016-11-22 11:25 GMT+03:00 Vladimir Ozerov <voze...@gridgain.com>: > > > >>> Igniters, > > > >>> > > > >>> I went through remaining tickets assigned to 1.8 and it seems that > we > > > are > > > >>> pretty close to release. As far as I understand the biggest > remaining > > > >>> feature is DML [1]. I think we can create separate branch for 1.8 > as > > > soon > > > >>> as it is merged. Alex, do you have any idea on when it might > happen? > > > >>> > > > >>> Vladimir. > > > >>> > > > >>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2294 > > > >>> > > > >>> On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 4:06 AM, Denis Magda <dma...@apache.org> > > > wrote: > > > >>> > > > >>>> Roman, > > > >>>> > > > >>>> That versions will be created after 1.8 gets released. Recently > > there > > > was > > > >>>> a discussion on the dev list [1] regarding the difficulties > related > > to > > > >>>> documentation maintenance when several documentation versions > > > co-exist at > > > >>>> the same time. > > > >>>> > > > >>>> It was decided that rather then create a new version for the > > > documentation > > > >>>> once a new feature added to Ignite it’s better to create a hidden > > page > > > >>>> under the current documentation version and make it visible once > the > > > next > > > >>>> version is created after the release. > > > >>>> > > > >>>> The bottom line is that, please create a hidden page with a suffix > > > >>>> “page_name-1.8” and once 1.8 gets released Prachi will create > > > readme.io < > > > >>>> http://readme.io/> 1.8 and make your doc visible. > > > >>>> > > > >>>> [1] http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble. > > > >>>> com/Maintaining-documentation-consistency-on-readme-io- > td10868.html > > < > > > >>>> http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble. > > > >>>> com/Maintaining-documentation-consistency-on-readme-io- > > td10868.html> > > > >>>> > > > >>>> — > > > >>>> Denis > > > >>>> > > > >>>>> On Nov 16, 2016, at 5:00 PM, Roman Shtykh > > <rsht...@yahoo.com.INVALID > > > > > > > >>>> wrote: > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> Denis, > > > >>>>> Any plans to add 1.8.0 in readme.io for new features? > > > >>>>> -Roman > > > >>>>> On Wednesday, November 16, 2016 6:08 AM, Denis Magda < > > > >>>> dma...@apache.org> wrote: > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> Igor, > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> It makes sense to wait for me while everything gets merged into > 1.8 > > > >>>> then. Please let me know over this discussion when the overall > merge > > > >>>> happens. > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> — > > > >>>>> Denis > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>>> On Nov 15, 2016, at 1:45 AM, Igor Sapego <isap...@gridgain.com> > > > wrote: > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> Denis, > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> I can merge PDO-related changes into 1.8 but without DML they > will > > > >>>> break tests > > > >>>>>> and even compilation so I don't see any sense in doing that > before > > > DML > > > >>>> is merged. > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> After DML is ready and merged I'll need some time to merge my > > > changes > > > >>>> and check > > > >>>>>> that everything works as intended. The code itself, tests and > > > examples > > > >>>> are ready. > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> Best Regards, > > > >>>>>> Igor > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 11:31 AM, Pavel Tupitsyn < > > > ptupit...@apache.org > > > >>>> <mailto:ptupit...@apache.org>> wrote: > > > >>>>>> Denis, [1] depends on [2], and [2](.NET: CacheEntryProcessor > > binary > > > >>>> mode) > > > >>>>>> is not a simple thing. We won't be able to do that for 1.8. > > > >>>>>> Other than that, I'll try to fit as many of them as I can. But I > > > can't > > > >>>>>> answer your question since I don't see any date yet. > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> By the way, you were going to help with the reviews. > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4128 < > > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4128> > > > >>>>>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3825 < > > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3825> > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 4:03 AM, Denis Magda <dma...@apache.org > > > >>>> <mailto:dma...@apache.org>> wrote: > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> *Alexander P., Igor S.,* > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> When will your merge all DML and ODBC (PDO) related changes > into > > > 1.8 > > > >>>>>>> branch? I’m looking forward to go through PDO [1] documentation > > > and be > > > >>>> sure > > > >>>>>>> that everything works as described on my side. > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> *Pavel,* > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> Do you think it will be possible to complete all the .NET > > usability > > > >>>>>>> tickets [2] under 1.8 and roll them out to the Apache Ignite > > users? > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3921 < > > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3921> > > > >>>>>>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4114 < > > > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4114> > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> — > > > >>>>>>> Denis > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> On Nov 9, 2016, at 6:55 AM, Denis Magda <dma...@gridgain.com > > > <mailto: > > > >>>> dma...@gridgain.com>> wrote: > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> Do we have a branch for ignite-1.8? Is there anyone who can > take > > > over > > > >>>> the > > > >>>>>>> release process of 1.8? > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> — > > > >>>>>>> Denis > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> On Nov 8, 2016, at 9:01 PM, Alexander Paschenko < > > > >>>>>>> alexander.a.pasche...@gmail.com <mailto:alexander.a.paschenko@ > > > >>>> gmail.com>> wrote: > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> Current status on DML: > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> - Basic data streamer support implemented (basicness is mostly > > > about > > > >>>>>>> configuration - say, currently there's no way to specify > > streamer's > > > >>>>>>> batch size via JDBC driver, but this can be improved easily). > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> - Fixed all minor stuff agreed with Vladimir. > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> - There are some tests that started failing after binary hash > > codes > > > >>>>>>> generation rework made by Vladimir in ignite-4011-1 branch, I > > will > > > ask > > > >>>>>>> him to look into it and fix those. Failing tests live in > > > >>>>>>> GridCacheBinaryObjectsAbstractSelfTest, and are as follows: > > > >>>>>>> - testPutWithFieldsHashing > > > >>>>>>> - testCrossFormatObjectsIdentity > > > >>>>>>> - testPutWithCustomHashing > > > >>>>>>> I added them personally during working on first version of auto > > > >>>>>>> hashing few weeks ago, and what they do is test these very > > hashing > > > >>>>>>> features. Again, prior to Vlad's rework those tests passed. So > > > could > > > >>>>>>> you please take a look? > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> - Working on Sergey V.'s comments about current code. > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> - Alex > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>>> > > > > > > > > > -- Sergey Kozlov GridGain Systems www.gridgain.com