Hi Romain, The only issue I see is the version. JSR107 spec is on version 1.0.0 [1], while the Geronimo JCache jar is on version 1.0-alpha-1.
Any chance you can upgrade the version? [1] https://github.com/jsr107/jsr107spec/tree/v1.0.0 D. On Sat, Mar 26, 2016 at 1:36 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Dmitriy, > > why not reusing geronimo jar? Generally @apache spec are owned by > geronimo and reused as much as possible using geronimo as umbrella > spec project. What's the issue you hit? > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau | Blog | Github | LinkedIn | Tomitriber > > > 2016-03-26 21:20 GMT+01:00 Dmitriy Setrakyan <dsetrak...@apache.org>: > > Sorry, this is the JCache maven dependency I was referring to: > > > http://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.apache.geronimo.specs/geronimo-jcache_1.0_spec > > > > > > On Sat, Mar 26, 2016 at 1:18 PM, Dmitriy Setrakyan < > dsetrak...@apache.org> > > wrote: > >> > >> Hello Geronimo community! > >> > >> I have noticed that Geronimo implements JCache spec and is using its own > >> JCache library hosted in Apache maven and licensed under Apache 2.0 > license > >> [1]. > >> > >> We, in Apache Ignite community also have implemented JCache > specification > >> and would like to do something similar. Do you know what steps do we > need to > >> take in order to have the latest JCache spec version licensed under > Apache > >> 2.0? > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Dmitriy Setrakyan > >> Apache Ignite, PMC chair > > > > >
