I prefer to throw a IgniteCheckerException. Thanks, kcheng
On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 2:41 PM, Ken Cheng <kcheng....@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Andrey Gura, > > > What's the expected behavior when the cache mode is "Local" but affinity > function is not "LocalAffinityFunction"? > > 1: Throw an exception? > 2: or change the affinity function rudely as "LocalAffinityFunction" and > log the warning message at same time? > > > Thanks, > kcheng > > On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 10:35 AM, Ken Cheng <kcheng....@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi Andrey Gura, >> >> Thank you very much! I would study this part of code first. >> >> Thanks, >> kcheng >> >> On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 6:37 PM, Andrey Gura <ag...@gridgain.com> wrote: >> >>> Ken, >>> >>> cache configuration validation and initialization occurs in >>> GridCacheProcessor class (methods validate() and initialize()). >>> >>> From my point of view two changes should be made: >>> >>> - during cache intialization LocalAffinityFunction should be set to cache >>> configuration if cache mode is LOCAL; >>> - warning about ignoring affinity function parameter should be moved from >>> validate() method to intialize() method. >>> >>> I hope this will help you. >>> >>> On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 12:12 PM, Ken Cheng <kcheng....@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> > Hi Andrey Gura, >>> > >>> > I am very new to Ignite, I am going to pick up >>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-1481. >>> > >>> > Can you please give more hint? >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > Thanks, >>> > kcheng >>> > >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Andrey Gura >>> GridGain Systems, Inc. >>> www.gridgain.com >>> >> >> >
