Artem right. The annotation should be removed in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-35 ticket.
On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 12:34 PM, Yakov Zhdanov <yzhda...@apache.org> wrote: > Thanks for clarifications, Artem! > > --Yakov > > 2015-11-25 12:27 GMT+03:00 Artem Shutak <ashu...@gridgain.com>: > > > Igniters, > > > > As I remember, support of the annotation has been deleted intentionally. > I > > think Nik can shed light on this. > > > > By the way, currently, you can use IgniteInstanceResource annotation to > get > > Ignite instance and getting MBeanServer. > > > > ignite.configuration().getMBeanServer() > > > > Thanks, > > -- Artem -- > > > > On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 12:19 PM, Yakov Zhdanov <yzhda...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > > > > Guys, I don't think we should delete this since it is not hard at all > to > > > fix injection properly. > > > > > > --Yakov > > > > > > 2015-11-25 11:40 GMT+03:00 Denis Magda <dma...@gridgain.com>: > > > > > > > Igniters, > > > > > > > > There is MBeanServerResource annotation available as a part of > Ignite. > > > > However, according to this JIRA issue [1] its never processed at the > > > > kernel level. > > > > > > > > My understanding is that we should neither delete it nor deprecate > but > > > > rather support at the kernel level injecting MBeanServer when the > > latter > > > is > > > > specified in IgniteConfiguration. > > > > > > > > Any thoughts on this? > > > > > > > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-1800 > > > > > > > > > >
