Just as a friendly reminder: readme.io hosting still opens us to the issue we've been discussing at length. Namely - the source of the documentation isn't hosted on the Apache premises. I remember there were some conversations with readme.io folks to add some extras for the imports or something like that. Were there any follow-ups on that front?
Sorry if I missed anything. Cos On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 04:43PM, Sergi Vladykin wrote: > AFAIK currently "Suggest Edit" works well on readme.io. > If someone wants to introduce a new topic, he can ask someone to do that on > dev/user lists. > > Sergi > > 2015-08-26 14:09 GMT+03:00 Alexey Kuznetsov <akuznet...@gridgain.com>: > > > I think contributor should provide at least some text file with a feature > > description. > > But collaboration on readme.io is a better approach. > > I don't know it is possible to introduce new topics on readme.io? > > I know that it is possible to suggest "changes". > > We could have a special "landing page" for new items from contributors in > > this case. > > > > On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 3:39 PM, Raul Kripalani <r...@evosent.com> wrote: > > > > > I believe that the current contribution process does not require > > > contributors to enhance/modify the user guide accordingly. > > > > > > Do you think it would make sense to add this as a requirement to the > > > process? > > > > > > Or are committers willing to take care of these docs in their entirety? > > > Usually it's most efficient to have the contributor document their own > > > feature/enhancement. > > > > > > We could use readme.io collaboration functionalities to Suggest Edits. > > > > > > Raúl. > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Alexey Kuznetsov > > GridGain Systems > > www.gridgain.com > >