Thanks Neelesh for getting us started on the 1.12.0 release!

-Max

On Sat, Aug 8, 2026 at 7:14 PM Neelesh Salian <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Thanks, Alex. Looks like the PR was added to the milestone.
>
> Cheng, thank you for the note. I do agree that at some point the default 
> should move forward, but there are still gaps to be closed on Variant as well 
> as Geo types.
> I don't think that would happen within the timeline of 1.12.
> Let me look at the current state and see what is pending, as well as improve 
> the tracking. I'll start a separate thread for that effort.
>
> On Sat, Aug 8, 2026 at 8:19 AM Cheng Pan <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> I assume the Iceberg Java already includes a full implementation of the 
>> Table Spec V3 features. Does the community have plans to switch the default 
>> table version from 2 to 3 for Iceberg tables created by Spark in the next 
>> release? This would help drive the adoption of new features such as Variant.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Cheng Pan
>>
>>
>>
>> On Aug 6, 2026, at 16:18, Alexandre Dutra <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Neelesh,
>>
>> If possible, I'd like to have this PR included:
>>
>> https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/15989
>>
>> It's the fix for the path segment encoding issue in Iceberg REST. The
>> PR got one review already but isn't approved yet.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Alex
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 5, 2026 at 10:37 PM Oğuzhan Ünlü <[email protected]> 
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Hi Neelesh,
>>
>> I'd like to get https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/16507 included in the 
>> milestone if possible. I previously asked for a review but didn't hear back. 
>> Not sure if that went to spam for some reason.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Oguzhan
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 5, 2026 at 11:03 PM Neelesh Salian <[email protected]> 
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> As mentioned during the community sync this morning, the release is on track.
>> A few updates:
>>
>> I plan to cut the branch / RC on or after August 26, 2026 (after the 
>> community sync that morning). I'll be working with Amogh to help with the 
>> branching + artifacts.
>> There are still active items needing reviews. Please take a look at the 
>> 1.12.0 milestone.
>> Calling out the Spark 4.2.0 PR: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/14984 
>> - it needs more eyes and review time to make this release.
>> I'll keep watching for blockers and bugs that should be part of the release 
>> and surface them as needed, including any forward-porting to Spark 4.2.
>>
>> If you have a feature(s), fix(es), or breaking change(s) you want considered 
>> for 1.12.0, please let me know.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Neelesh
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 5, 2026 at 3:54 PM Steven Wu <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>
>> If we develop good habit of regular releases, we normally won't need to hold 
>> the release train to get things in (except for critical security and 
>> correctness issues) as the next one is 2-3 months away.
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 5, 2026 at 3:42 PM Neelesh Salian <[email protected]> 
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> With 1.11.0 out the door, I want to open up the planning around 1.12.0.
>> As Steven noted on the dev list (thread for 1.11), 1.11.0 took roughly 8 
>> months from 1.10.0. This is longer than the 3-4 month cadence we have 
>> previously discussed.
>> For 1.12.0 I'd like us to aim closer to that target.
>>
>> I'll be acting as the release manager for this release. Here are a few notes 
>> to kick things off:
>>
>> Tentative release target: late August / early September 2026 (~3 months from 
>> 1.11.0).
>> Curation: We'll use the June 24 community sync as the formal kickoff to 
>> surface in-flight work and call out anything that should land in this 
>> release.
>> Cadence reminder: If something doesn't make it in 1.12, the next one is ~3 
>> months out (1.13).
>> Mid-cycle check-in: I'll send a state-of-the-release update around mid-July 
>> with what is in, what is in-flight, and what remains a blocker.
>> Tracking: The open issues and PRs targeting this release are tagged with the 
>> Iceberg 1.12.0 milestone. I'll keep this milestone updated as things land in 
>> the repo.
>>
>> If you have a feature, fix, or breaking change you want considered for 
>> 1.12.0, please reply on this thread or flag it on the June 24 sync.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Neelesh
>>
>>

Reply via email to