Hey everyone,

Closing the loop on this conversation. I've merged the PR above (thanks
Russell), and double check that the site reflects the changes,
https://iceberg.apache.org/

Best,
Kevin Liu

On Mon, Sep 29, 2025 at 9:19 AM Kevin Liu <[email protected]> wrote:

> Thanks everyone for chiming in on this. Looks like we have consensus to
> move forward to remove the blogs and talks page.
> If there's no more feedback, I'll merge the PR this afternoon (
> https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/14110).
>
> Alex has started a thread on a community maintained list for blogs and
> posts (https://lists.apache.org/thread/1r0w72d9nqm1rqwc81v3rccnf8pvm08l).
> We can migrate the contents to that list. Thanks Alex!
>
> Best,
> Kevin Liu
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 23, 2025 at 11:58 AM Ryan Blue <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> +1 for removing the blogs page. I don't think that we need it anymore to
>> highlight activity.
>>
>> I also don't think that there is a need to keep it around, but I wouldn't
>> oppose at least replacing it with a page that explains why we no longer
>> maintain it in case it was referenced in books. I don't think that we need
>> to maintain the links for this purpose because I wouldn't expect existing
>> links to go to our page only to make the reader click a link to the real
>> post.
>>
>> As far as boosting search rankings, I don't think that is a good reason
>> to keep it either. The page is no longer a good representation of all of
>> the Iceberg content out there (which is great!) so it's no longer providing
>> more signal than noise.
>>
>> I'm also +1 for linking to the YouTube channel instead of having the
>> talks list.
>>
>> Ryan
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 19, 2025 at 4:41 PM Russell Spitzer <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> I'm not running into an error, I just didn't have time to check the
>>> linter so I was wondering if it would throw an error or if it's ok with
>>> orphan pages.
>>>
>>> On Fri, Sep 19, 2025 at 6:04 PM Kevin Liu <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Assuming you're referring to this markdown linter from #13977
>>>> <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/13977/files#diff-9b85f23b4c70aa16ae63b7e816cdfeb7312f5c941d758cb9e6f05939004e1886R243>,
>>>> I think you can change the path to `**/*.md` so it searches through all the
>>>> markdown files.
>>>> What error are you seeing from the linter? I can also ping you on
>>>> Slack.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Sep 19, 2025 at 2:39 PM Russell Spitzer <
>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Does anyone know if we can support an orphaned page in MkDocs without
>>>>> the new Markdown linter complaining? I'm testing
>>>>> out a build where we keep the page but disable robots/nofollow on it.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Sep 19, 2025 at 1:24 PM Kevin Liu <[email protected]>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Thank you, Alex! I think we can proceed with the removal first.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm also +1 on an official blog for project announcements.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>> Kevin Liu
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 19, 2025 at 10:46 AM Alex Merced
>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I have new home for continued development of the list created that
>>>>>>> people will be able to make pull requests into to add blogs and will 
>>>>>>> cover
>>>>>>> a few other Lakehouse related OSS projects. Will post the details early
>>>>>>> next week, earlier if possible.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> *Alex Merced <https://bio.alexmerced.com/data>, *
>>>>>>> *Head of DevRel, Dremio **Dremio.com*
>>>>>>> <https://www.dremio.com/?utm_medium=email&utm_source=signature&utm_term=na&utm_content=email-signature&utm_campaign=email-signature>*/
>>>>>>> **Follow Us on LinkedIn!* <https://www.linkedin.com/company/dremio>
>>>>>>> *Resources for Getting Hands-on with Apache Iceberg/Dremio*
>>>>>>> <https://medium.com/data-engineering-with-dremio/a-deep-intro-to-apache-iceberg-and-resources-for-learning-more-be51535cff74>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 19, 2025 at 12:39 PM Kevin Liu <[email protected]>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The relevant links are either the top-level pages:
>>>>>>>> - https://iceberg.apache.org/blogs/
>>>>>>>> - https://iceberg.apache.org/talks/
>>>>>>>> or the individual posts they reference. Examples from each page:
>>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>> https://iceberg.apache.org/blogs/#kafka-to-iceberg-exploring-the-options
>>>>>>>> - https://iceberg.apache.org/talks/#supporting-s3-tables-in-daft
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Each post already links to an external source, so fixing the links
>>>>>>>> should be relatively easy.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I find the current blogs and posts useful, and they serve as a nice
>>>>>>>> look back at the project’s history. However, I think we should find 
>>>>>>>> another
>>>>>>>> home for this content. Just not in the iceberg.apache.org site,
>>>>>>>> where every change requires approval through the repo.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I’m still in favor of removing these pages from the website and
>>>>>>>> moving them to another location.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>>> Kevin Liu
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 19, 2025 at 10:35 AM Anton Okolnychyi <
>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I think the project is too big now for us to maintain the list in
>>>>>>>>> its current form. I believe the original intent was to include 
>>>>>>>>> references
>>>>>>>>> to any mentions of Iceberg to boost visibility as there was no 
>>>>>>>>> company that
>>>>>>>>> would sponsor any media coverage for Iceberg in early days. At that 
>>>>>>>>> time
>>>>>>>>> the list of mentions was very small and we didn’t have any vendors.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> We can keep links accessible not to break books and other printed
>>>>>>>>> materials.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Also, +1 on an official blog with announcements similar to Flink
>>>>>>>>> and other larger projects.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> - Anton
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 19, 2025 at 4:54 PM Russell Spitzer <
>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I could see us keeping a deprecated version of the page, but I
>>>>>>>>>> think the rationale of boosting search engine impacts for blog posts 
>>>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>>> are already on the page is actually one of the reasons we should 
>>>>>>>>>> remove the
>>>>>>>>>> page. As a community we don't want to have a set of "special" blog 
>>>>>>>>>> posts
>>>>>>>>>> that the project gives special importance. If posts on this page get 
>>>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>> boost on search engines that other posts don't get, it makes me a bit
>>>>>>>>>> nervous.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Sep 18, 2025 at 11:41 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <
>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> It sounds reasonable to me.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> For background, Apache projects have different approaches about
>>>>>>>>>>> blog:
>>>>>>>>>>> - some are using blog more like announcements for the projects
>>>>>>>>>>> but
>>>>>>>>>>> also dependent projects (https://camel.apache.org/blog/)
>>>>>>>>>>> - some are just listing blog post links related to the project
>>>>>>>>>>> (https://karaf.apache.org/documentation.html#articles)
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> The foundation has a blog related to news (
>>>>>>>>>>> https://news.apache.org/).
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I'm not a big fan of blog in projects with content (because it's
>>>>>>>>>>> hard
>>>>>>>>>>> to maintain and never up to date), but I think it's valuable for
>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>> community to easily find resources about the projects.
>>>>>>>>>>> So, just a blog page with links to different blog posts is good
>>>>>>>>>>> enough
>>>>>>>>>>> (but it needs some attention to be "maintained").
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Just my $0.01
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>>>>> JB
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Sep 18, 2025 at 11:03 PM Russell Spitzer
>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>> > Hi Y'all
>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>> > We talked about this a bit in a community sync a while back
>>>>>>>>>>> and I know a bunch of committers have
>>>>>>>>>>> > been working off some of the consensus we reached then but I'm
>>>>>>>>>>> not sure we ever actually documented
>>>>>>>>>>> > this.
>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>> > 1. Should the Apache Iceberg community still maintain a set of
>>>>>>>>>>> Blogs and Talks that are curated on the
>>>>>>>>>>> > main site by committers and PMC members?
>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>> > The arguments in favor:
>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>> > The current state requires individuals to make decisions on
>>>>>>>>>>> about inclusion/exclusion of content
>>>>>>>>>>> > It is very difficult to maintain and keep up to date
>>>>>>>>>>> > There are lots of blog and talk aggregations for Iceberg
>>>>>>>>>>> content out there already
>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>> > The arguments against:
>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>> > Have an easy place for folks to find more Iceberg Content
>>>>>>>>>>> > Have a location to post internal announcements
>>>>>>>>>>> > -----------
>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>> > Personally I think we should just drop the blogs site for now
>>>>>>>>>>> with the option of bringing back an Iceberg
>>>>>>>>>>> > dev only blog in the future and switch the Talks page to just
>>>>>>>>>>> link out to the official Youtube channel which mostly
>>>>>>>>>>> > has entries for Iceberg Summit and our community syncs.
>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>> > -------
>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>> > 2. Should all vendor/integrations link out to external
>>>>>>>>>>> documentation rather than having in tree maintained
>>>>>>>>>>> > documentation?
>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>> > This I think is more straightforward. We have already had a
>>>>>>>>>>> lot of link-rot and Integration documentation falling behind
>>>>>>>>>>> > actual integrations. Here I really don't want to break any
>>>>>>>>>>> previous hard links to Iceberg's docs so I think we should leave
>>>>>>>>>>> > everything currently in tree, in tree. But for all new
>>>>>>>>>>> contributions and on any updates to a vendor.md or integration.md we
>>>>>>>>>>> > should always link out to third party documentation unless we
>>>>>>>>>>> are documenting something that is actually in the Iceberg
>>>>>>>>>>> > library (like S3FileIO and friends).
>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>> > Thanks as usual everyone,
>>>>>>>>>>> > Russ
>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>> > Here is a PR with my suggested changes for the above two points
>>>>>>>>>>> > https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/14110
>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>

Reply via email to