Thanks Huaxin for volunteering! I also went ahead and added
https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/14161 to the 1.10.1 milestone which
also looks to address the S3FileIO close issue mentioned earlier in the
thread.

On Thu, Sep 25, 2025 at 1:15 PM huaxin gao <[email protected]> wrote:

> Thanks for kicking this off, Amogh, and thanks everyone for the fix
> pointers.
>
> I’m happy to volunteer as release manager for 1.10.1. I’ll track the
> candidates mentioned in this thread, monitor review progress, and verify
> backports.
>
> If there are other must-have fixes, please reply here so we can consider
> them for the patch.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Huaxin
>
> On Tue, Sep 23, 2025 at 12:53 PM Amogh Jahagirdar <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> Thanks all!
>>
>> >Would it be possible to include
>> https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/14153 to enable variant shredding
>>
>> Regarding this one, I don't think it should be in a patch release since
>> it's exposing an API on the data file writer and not really a fix. Besides
>> it is technically possible already to just use the lower level parquet
>> writer with the variant shredding spec and then produce a data file from
>> that (it's a bit more clunky for sure which is why that API change in the
>> PR is helpful) but don't think it quite meets the criteria for being in a
>> minor release. That criteria is primarily based on fixes.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Amogh Jahagirdar
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 23, 2025 at 10:13 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Amogh
>>>
>>> Thanks for starting the discussion!
>>>
>>> I will create the PR to "relax" the LICENSE/NOTICE (to avoid the
>>> update pain before release).
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> JB
>>>
>>> On Mon, Sep 22, 2025 at 6:29 PM Amogh Jahagirdar <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > Hey folks,
>>> >
>>> > Iceberg 1.10 was released 2 weeks ago and there was one issue around
>>> incorrect variant filtering reported that I think meets the criteria for a
>>> patch release. The fix PR is in (thank you Drew). I wanted to kick this
>>> discussion thread off in case folks had other issues in the 1.10 release
>>> that they think warrant a patch release.
>>> >
>>> > I also think this PR  is a good candidate for a patch release; this is
>>> for addressing a long-standing issue where closing the S3FileIO during an
>>> event like moving broadcast variables from memory to disk leads to an
>>> unexpected closing of the http client. There's still some discussion on the
>>> approach of the fix but there's general recognition that it's a legitimate
>>> issue, so I think it'd be ideal to get this in for a patch release as well.
>>> >
>>> > I've also created a milestone here.
>>> >
>>> > Thanks,
>>> >
>>> > Amogh Jahagirdar
>>>
>>

Reply via email to