+1 (non-binding) On Thu, Sep 11, 2025 at 6:06 AM Amogh Jahagirdar <2am...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1, thanks Peter > > > > On Wed, Sep 10, 2025 at 2:08 PM Wing Yew Poon <wyp...@cloudera.com.invalid> > wrote: > >> +1 (non-binding) >> >> On Wed, Sep 10, 2025 at 12:48 PM Ryan Blue <rdb...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> +1 to removing this from the Java implementation and API. >>> >>> On Wed, Sep 10, 2025 at 10:08 AM Steven Wu <stevenz...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> +1 >>>> >>>> On Wed, Sep 10, 2025 at 9:30 AM Russell Spitzer < >>>> russell.spit...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> +1 >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Sep 10, 2025 at 10:58 AM Péter Váry < >>>>> peter.vary.apa...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> The Position Deletes With Row (PDWR) feature, originally introduced >>>>>> in the Iceberg V2 specification, has been deprecated in V3. >>>>>> >>>>>> Following the discussion in the previous thread [1], we propose >>>>>> deprecating PDWR in the Java implementation starting with the Iceberg >>>>>> 1.11.0 release. We plan to remove PDWR support entirely from the Java >>>>>> implementation beginning with Iceberg 1.12.0. >>>>>> >>>>>> While PDWR will remain part of the V2 spec, the Java implementation >>>>>> will no longer write PDWR delete files. It will only support reading the >>>>>> position and file name columns from previously created delete files or >>>>>> those generated by other engines. >>>>>> >>>>>> For reference, the proposed changes are available here [2]. >>>>>> >>>>>> Please cast your vote. >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>> Peter >>>>>> >>>>>> [1] - >>>>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/8jw6pb2vq3ghmdqf1yvy8n5n6gg1fq5s >>>>>> [2] - https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/14045 >>>>>> >>>>>
