In the last community sync, we have decided to discuss relative path proposal 
in a separate meeting. Please subscribe to Iceberg Dev Events[1] calendar to 
join the meeting. 


Thanks for your interest. Contributions are always welcome. Please reach out to 
authors to see how you can collaborate. 


[1] - https://iceberg.apache.org/community/#iceberg-community-events

~ Anurag Mantripragada

> On Jul 3, 2025, at 11:59 PM, ally heev <allyh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi folks,
> Do you accept contributions from people other than authors on improvement 
> proposals? I would really like to contribute on the implementation side. 
> Also, is the spec definition finalized? I see a couple of unaddressed queries 
> in the doc
> 
> 
> On Wed, May 28, 2025 at 3:44 AM Talat Uyarer <tal...@google.com.invalid> 
> wrote:
>> Hi, Iceberg Community,
>> 
>> As mentioned at the last sync, Dan and I have been working on a proposal to 
>> add support for relative paths, which has been a long requested feature. 
>> There have been a number of discussions/proposals over the years, but we'd 
>> like to scope down and refocus effort to make some meaningful progress on 
>> this issue.
>> 
>> Please take a look at the linked doc and provide feedback. We'd love to open 
>> up discussion on this topic at the next community sync and we can hold 
>> one-off syncs on the topic if there's a lot of interest.
>> 
>> You can access Iceberg's First V4 Spec change from here :)
>> 
>> Proposal Issue: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/issues/13141
>> Doc: https://s.apache.org/iceberg-spec-relative-path
>> 
>> Talat

Reply via email to