While I agree that the configurable separator is the best solution that balances trade-offs, I don't think that we should move forward when there has been a veto from the community.
In Iceberg and most ASF communities, votes are intended to confirm consensus --- not to make decisions. Since we don't have consensus we should continue discussion and see if we can address Robert's rationale for his veto. (Which was, unfortunately, in a different thread that I'd have to dig up.) Ryan On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 9:07 AM Xuanwo <xua...@apache.org> wrote: > +1 (no-binding) > > Personally I don't want this change, but I haven't found any other ways to > address issue #10338. It seems that this proposal is the best solution > available. > > On Thu, Apr 24, 2025, at 23:36, Zac Blanco wrote: > > +1 (nb) > > > > On 2024/08/20 07:05:45 Robert Stupp wrote: > >> -1 (nb) > >> > >> On 16.08.24 17:46, Dmitri Bourlatchkov wrote: > >> > +1 (nb) to the spec change. > >> > > >> > Cheers, > >> > Dmitri. > >> > > >> > On Fri, Aug 16, 2024 at 4:31 AM Eduard Tudenhöfner > >> > <etudenhoef...@apache.org> wrote: > >> > > >> > Hey everyone, > >> > > >> > as I mentioned on the DISCUSS thread, this is providing a simple > >> > path forward for users of the V1 APIs (make the namespace > >> > separator *configurable* instead of *hardcoded*) that are either > >> > running into issue #10338 > >> > <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/issues/10338> or will > >> > eventually when they upgrade their server stack. > >> > > >> > The configuration part is *entirely optional* for REST server > >> > implementers and there's no behavioral change for existing > >> > installations. > >> > > >> > Please vote on the wording changes in the REST Spec in #10877 > >> > <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/10877>. > >> > > >> > The vote will remain open for at least 72 hours. > >> > > >> > Thanks > >> > Eduard > >> > > >> -- > >> Robert Stupp > >> @snazy > >> > > -- > Xuanwo > > https://xuanwo.io/ >
