My mistake, I suggested sending out an email with a quick vote on the PR. I like the suggestion to use this thread for discussion since the number of options is limited.
I'm in favor of deprecating the field, to avoid that we re-use the field-id in the future. Kind regards, Fokko Op di 11 feb 2025 om 05:46 schreef Manu Zhang <owenzhang1...@gmail.com>: > Hi Jacob, > > Thanks for initiating the vote. > Typically, we would first have a DISCUSSION thread to reach a consensus on > the preferred option and then follow it up with a VOTE thread for > confirmation. > > Maybe we can take this as a DISCUSSION thread? > > Best, > Manu > > > On Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 7:20 AM Jacob Marble > <jacobmar...@firetiger.com.invalid> wrote: > >> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours. >> >> I propose that distinct_counts be either deprecated (#12182 >> <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/12182>) or removed (#12183 >> <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/12183>) from the spec. >> >> According to #767 <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/issues/767> >> data_file.distinct_counts was deprecated about four years ago. Furthermore, >> it not implemented in the canonical Java and Python implementations >> >> Please share your thoughts, and vote one of the following: >> - remove >> - deprecate >> - no-op >> >> Jacob Marble >> 🔥🐅 >> >
