Awesome! Thanks, Sung! :) On Fri, Nov 22, 2024 at 9:16 AM Fokko Driesprong <fo...@apache.org> wrote:
> I think Sung beat you to it: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/11632 > > As mentioned earlier it would be awesome if we could have a nightly build > so we can test all the different languages against the nightly. In this > case, when there are changes or new features, we can test/implement them > right away. > > Kind regards, > Fokko > > Op vr 22 nov 2024 om 18:11 schreef Kevin Liu <kevin.jq....@gmail.com>: > >> Thanks for setting this up, JB! It looks like PR #11283 >> <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/11283> is close to being merged. >> >> What is the deployment strategy for the Docker image? Ideally, this >> process could be fully automated using GitHub and GitHub Actions. >> >> I’d love to hear everyone’s thoughts on this! >> >> Best regards, >> Kevin Liu >> >> >> On Fri, Nov 22, 2024 at 6:06 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> >> wrote: >> >>> Hi folks, >>> >>> I created the iceberg repo on DockerHub (in the Apache org): >>> >>> https://hub.docker.com/r/apache/iceberg >>> >>> I created an "Iceberg team" on DockerHub. >>> >>> I created DOCKERHUB_USER and DOCKERHUB_TOKEN credentials for the >>> Iceberg repo. That will allow us to directly push on DockerHub repo >>> from GitHub Action. >>> I also added Fokko to the repo. >>> >>> If you are a committer and you want to get permission on the Iceberg >>> DockerHub repo, please let me know, I will add your DockerHub account >>> to the "iceberg team". >>> >>> Thanks ! >>> >>> Regards >>> JB >>> >>> On Fri, Nov 15, 2024 at 7:39 PM Kevin Liu <kevin.jq....@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> > >>> > +1 to Iceberg REST TCK docker image. Thanks, JB for driving this and >>> Ajantha for setting up the docker image. >>> > We already found a bug in PyIceberg [1] from integrating with the TCK >>> docker image. It would be great to have a nightly build, perhaps we can set >>> up a Github Action to automate the docker image publishing. >>> > >>> > Best, >>> > Kevin Liu >>> > >>> > >>> > [1] https://github.com/apache/iceberg-python/pull/1321 >>> > >>> > On Fri, Nov 15, 2024 at 1:36 AM Fokko Driesprong <fo...@apache.org> >>> wrote: >>> >> >>> >> +1 — excited to see this happen! >>> >> >>> >> For the TCK, I think we can release this with the Java together, and >>> have a nightly build (tag the container with nightly Dockerhub). This way >>> we can already test out (and start implementing) the new features in the >>> related projects. Thoughts on that? >>> >> >>> >>> Regarding the Kafka Connect Docker image, I believe that if we >>> maintain it, we could also manage other integration images, such as those >>> for Spark and Trino with Iceberg. We should have a separate discussion on >>> which integration images Iceberg should officially support. >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> Let's split out that discussion. My take on that is that we want to >>> defer that to the query engines. In an ideal situation, the Iceberg >>> integration should be part of the project itself (e.g. with Hive 4 where it >>> is maintained by Hive itself). For Spark itself, it only requires a runtime >>> to be added through the packages argument, and would love to see if we can >>> avoid maintaining images for that. >>> >> >>> >> Kind regards, >>> >> Fokko >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> Op do 14 nov 2024 om 18:16 schreef Christian Thiel < >>> christ...@hansetag.com.invalid>: >>> >>> >>> >>> +1 for this as well – for us especially the REST TCK image would be >>> nice. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> From: Bryan Keller <brya...@gmail.com> >>> >>> Date: Thursday, 14. November 2024 at 17:13 >>> >>> To: dev@iceberg.apache.org <dev@iceberg.apache.org> >>> >>> Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Create Iceberg DockerHub repository >>> >>> >>> >>> +1 this would be great! Thanks JB. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -Bryan >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Nov 14, 2024, at 8:30 AM, Ajantha Bhat <ajanthab...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> +1 for setting up the DockerHub repo, >>> >>> >>> >>> We discussed about this already in >>> https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@iceberg.apache.org/msg07888.html >>> >>> >>> >>> Now that the Docker image PR is ready for the REST catalog adapter, >>> we can proceed with setting up the DockerHub repository. >>> >>> >>> >>> Regarding the Kafka Connect Docker image, I believe that if we >>> maintain it, we could also manage other integration images, such as those >>> for Spark and Trino with Iceberg. We should have a separate discussion on >>> which integration images Iceberg should officially support. >>> >>> >>> >>> For now, maintaining the REST catalog adapter image has already been >>> approved in earlier discussions, so let’s start with that. >>> >>> >>> >>> - Ajantha >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Nov 14, 2024 at 9:45 PM Sung Yun <sun...@apache.org> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> Hi JB, >>> >>> >>> >>> That sounds great!! >>> >>> >>> >>> The REST TCK /adapter docker image will be super useful for the >>> Iceberg subprojects as it will ensure that they have access to a >>> light-weight REST Catalog Server image with the latest features to run >>> integration tests against. >>> >>> >>> >>> Sung >>> >>> >>> >>> On 2024/11/14 15:41:04 Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: >>> >>> > Hi folks, >>> >>> > >>> >>> > While reviewing https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/11283, we >>> >>> > discussed having a DockerHub repository for Iceberg. >>> >>> > >>> >>> > I can create this repository, similar to other Apache projects >>> (like >>> >>> > for example https://hub.docker.com/r/apache/activemq-classic, >>> >>> > https://hub.docker.com/r/apache/airflow, etc). >>> >>> > I can create an iceberg group (on DockerHub), and committers can >>> ask >>> >>> > to join (in order to be able to push docker images). >>> >>> > >>> >>> > For now, the purpose of this DockerHub repo is to host: >>> >>> > - Iceberg REST TCK docker images >>> >>> > - Iceberg Kafka Connect docker images >>> >>> > >>> >>> > Thoughts ? >>> >>> > >>> >>> > Regards >>> >>> > JB >>> >>> > >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>
