+1

-Jack

On Tue, Nov 19, 2024 at 7:45 AM Russell Spitzer <russell.spit...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> +1
>
> On Tue, Nov 19, 2024 at 4:11 AM Fokko Driesprong <fo...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> Hey Manu,
>>
>> That's an excellent question. I took the following rationale:
>>
>>    - For the code, the iceberg-core module, a minor release deprecation
>>    cycle is required
>>    <https://iceberg.apache.org/contribute/#semantic-versioning>.
>>    - For the spec, I noticed that the deprecation of the
>>    
>> <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/blob/7af519ad5df13256fda480cc31e975e63dd8763b/open-api/rest-catalog-open-api.yaml#L186-L187>
>>    getToken
>>    
>> <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/blob/7af519ad5df13256fda480cc31e975e63dd8763b/open-api/rest-catalog-open-api.yaml#L186-L187>
>>    endpoint
>>    
>> <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/blob/7af519ad5df13256fda480cc31e975e63dd8763b/open-api/rest-catalog-open-api.yaml#L186-L187>
>>  was
>>    set for removal in 2.0, so that's what I took for the last-column-id PR
>>    as well.
>>
>> To conclude: both spec and code will be deprecated in the following minor
>> release (1.8.x), the removal from the code is staged for the next minor
>> (1.9.x) or major release (2.x.x), and the removal from the spec is planned
>> for (2.x.x). Hope this clarifies.
>>
>> Kind regards,
>> Fokko Driesprong
>>
>> Op di 19 nov 2024 om 10:45 schreef Manu Zhang <owenzhang1...@gmail.com>:
>>
>>> Thanks Fokko.
>>>
>>> To be clear, are you proposing to deprecate last-column-id in 1.8.0 and
>>> remove in 1.9.0+?
>>>
>>> On Tue, Nov 19, 2024 at 4:18 PM Fokko Driesprong <fo...@apache.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi everyone,
>>>>
>>>> Based on the positive feedback on the [DISCUSS] thread
>>>> <https://lists.apache.org/thread/jz5s7pm2bhbm87ft495d6yrsh3bqvtb9> and
>>>> the pull-request on GitHub
>>>> <https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/11514/>, I would like to raise
>>>> a vote to deprecate and remove the last-column-id field from the spec.
>>>> Since this is a spec change, please vote in the next 72 hours:
>>>>
>>>> [ ] +1, commit the proposed spec changes
>>>> [ ] 0
>>>> [ ] -1, do not make these changes because...
>>>>
>>>> Kind regards,
>>>> Fokko
>>>>
>>>

Reply via email to