The 19th works best for me. On Mon, Apr 10, 2023 at 11:27 PM Jack Ye <yezhao...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Jan, > > Sorry for the late reply, I am currently on vacation. As I said in the > community sync, we have folks in AWS that are maintaining an internal C++ > implementation, and it would be great to join this meeting to develop a > shared community solution together. > > I can go with all the time slots, I will loop in related people and see > what time slots work for them. I will reply with our preferred time slots > and a list of people with emails to invite later this week. > > Cheers, > Jack Ye > > On Fri, Apr 7, 2023 at 5:47 AM Driesprong, Fokko <fo...@apache.org> wrote: > >> Hi Jan, >> >> Thanks for raising this, and I'd love to join the sync. I did quite a bit >> of work on the Python implementation, and I'm happy to help with the >> Rust/C++ SDK as well. I'm neither a Rust nor C++ programmer (did some C++ >> in the past), but happy to help with the implementation by providing >> context. For me, all of the abovementioned slots work. >> >> Kind regards, >> Fokko Driesprong >> >> Op vr 7 apr 2023 om 14:10 schreef Jan Kaul <jank...@mailbox.org.invalid>: >> >>> Hi iceberg community, >>> >>> Like discussed in the last Iceberg Sync, it would be great to have >>> another meeting to discuss how to combine our efforts for a C++ and/or >>> Rust SDK. >>> >>> Here are three possible dates for the Sync: >>> >>> 1. 18.04.23 16:00 UTC >>> >>> 2. 19.04.23 16:00 UTC >>> >>> 3. 20.04.23 16:00 UTC >>> >>> For those who want to join the meeting, it would be great if you could >>> answer this email with the dates that you are available. I will then >>> create an online meeting for the date where most people can join. >>> >>> I'm looking forward to talking to you. >>> >>> Best wishes, >>> >>> Jan Kaul >>> >>> -- Ryan Blue Tabular
