-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/20435/#review40742
-----------------------------------------------------------



common/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/hive/common/FileUtils.java
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/20435/#comment73883>

    dstFS.getFileStatus(dst) is called twice here. We should be able to reduce 
to one.



common/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/hive/common/FileUtils.java
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/20435/#comment73884>

    I saw FileSystem.setPermission(Path, FsPermission), which might be what 
you're looking for. If recursion is the concern, it's probably not too hard to 
write a util method to do that. In fact you may even be able to find the code 
from FsShell.java. Just for your consideration.


- Xuefu Zhang


On April 17, 2014, 4:58 a.m., Szehon Ho wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/20435/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated April 17, 2014, 4:58 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for hive and Brock Noland.
> 
> 
> Bugs: HIVE-6916
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-6916
> 
> 
> Repository: hive-git
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> This fixes the CopyTask (used by export/import) to also do the permission 
> inheritance semantics, if the flag is on.  Like elsewhere in the code, this 
> is using the HDFS shell because it allows specification of recursion (whereas 
> I could not find it in the HDFS-API).
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   common/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/hive/common/FileUtils.java b36a016 
>   
> itests/hive-unit/src/test/java/org/apache/hadoop/hive/ql/security/TestFolderPermissions.java
>  a635bb0 
>   ql/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/hive/ql/exec/CopyTask.java b429a58 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/20435/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Added a unit test for the same.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Szehon Ho
> 
>

Reply via email to