[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-6429?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13911249#comment-13911249
]
Sergey Shelukhin commented on HIVE-6429:
----------------------------------------
note that I also rearranged code so diff with trunk would be easier, as I was
diffing looking for bugs. Diff between iterations might be harder. Timestamp
serialization was broken, some null checks were missing.
> MapJoinKey has large memory overhead in typical cases
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HIVE-6429
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-6429
> Project: Hive
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Sergey Shelukhin
> Assignee: Sergey Shelukhin
> Attachments: HIVE-6429.01.patch, HIVE-6429.02.patch,
> HIVE-6429.03.patch, HIVE-6429.04.patch, HIVE-6429.05.patch,
> HIVE-6429.06.patch, HIVE-6429.WIP.patch, HIVE-6429.patch
>
>
> The only thing that MJK really needs it hashCode and equals (well, and
> construction), so there's no need to have array of writables in there.
> Assuming all the keys for a table have the same structure, for the common
> case where keys are primitive types, we can store something like a byte array
> combination of keys to reduce the memory usage. Will probably speed up
> compares too.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1.5#6160)
