[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-4429?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13643512#comment-13643512
]
Lianhui Wang commented on HIVE-4429:
------------------------------------
Mihir Kulkarni
sorry, my mistakes.
Navis
yes, there are some bugs in reducededuplication, i donot confirm that it is
fixed.but i think the inner order by can be removed in this case.
> Nested ORDER BY produces incorrect result
> -----------------------------------------
>
> Key: HIVE-4429
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-4429
> Project: Hive
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Query Processor, SQL, UDF
> Affects Versions: 0.9.0
> Environment: Red Hat Linux VM with Hive 0.9 and Hadoop 2.0
> Reporter: Mihir Kulkarni
> Priority: Critical
> Attachments: Hive_Command_Script.txt, HiveQuery.txt, Test_Data.txt
>
>
> Nested ORDER BY clause doesn't honor the outer one in specific case.
> The below query produces result which honors only the inner ORDER BY clause.
> (it produces only 1 MapRed job)
> {code:borderStyle=solid}
> SELECT alias.b0 as d0, alias.b1 as d1
> FROM
> (SELECT test.a0 as b0, test.a1 as b1
> FROM test
> ORDER BY b1 ASC, b0 DESC) alias
> ORDER BY d0 ASC, d1 DESC;
> {code}
> ----
> On the other hand the query below honors the outer ORDER BY clause which
> produces the correct result. (it produces 2 MapRed jobs)
> {code:borderStyle=solid}
> SELECT alias.b0 as d0, alias.b1 as d1
> FROM
> (SELECT test.a0 as b0, test.a1 as b1
> FROM test
> ORDER BY b1 ASC, b0 DESC) alias
> ORDER BY d0 DESC, d1 DESC;
> {code}
> ----
> Any other combination of nested ORDER BY clauses does produce the correct
> result.
> Please see attachments for query, schema and Hive Commands for reprocase.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
